Yamane Teiichi, Date Taro, Kanzaki Yasuko, Inada Keiichi, Matsuo Seiichiro, Shibayama Kenri, Miyanaga Satoru, Miyazaki Hidekazu, Sugimoto Ken-ichi, Mochizuki Seibu
Department of Cardiology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Nishi-shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Circ J. 2007 May;71(5):753-60. doi: 10.1253/circj.71.753.
The limited efficacy and complications of segmental ostial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for treating atrial fibrillation (AF) have been discussed so, in the present study the feasibility and efficiency of performing segmental pulmonary vein (PV) antrum isolation to treat AF were assessed.
A total of 187 patients with drug-refractory AF (paroxysmal 120, persistent 67) underwent segmental PVI guided by circumferential 20-electrode catheters (Lasso). Radiofrequency (RF) current was delivered either at the ostium using a regular Lasso (15-20 mm in diameter, 70 patients: Group 1) or at the antrum using a larger Lasso (25-30 mm in diameter, 117 patients: Group 2). A significantly wider region had to be ablated, with a longer RF application time, to isolate all 4 PVs in Group 2 patients than in Group 1 patients. Although the rate of recurrence of AF after the initial session was equal in both groups, a significantly greater number of patients were free from AF after a mean of 1.4 procedures in Group 2 than in Group 1 (93% vs 76% for paroxysmal AF, 78% vs 48% for persistent AF).
Segmental antral PVI using large-sized Lasso catheters was found to be more effective and safer than ostial PVI for the treatment of AF.
节段性肺静脉口部隔离术(PVI)治疗心房颤动(AF)的疗效有限且存在并发症,因此,在本研究中评估了进行节段性肺静脉(PV)前庭隔离术治疗AF的可行性和有效性。
总共187例药物难治性AF患者(阵发性120例,持续性67例)接受了由20极环形导管(Lasso)引导的节段性PVI。使用常规Lasso(直径15 - 20毫米,70例患者:第1组)在肺静脉口部施加射频(RF)电流,或使用更大的Lasso(直径25 - 30毫米,117例患者:第2组)在前庭施加RF电流。与第1组患者相比,第2组患者为隔离所有4条肺静脉必须消融更宽的区域,且RF应用时间更长。尽管两组初次手术后AF复发率相同,但第2组平均经过1.4次手术后无AF的患者数量显著多于第1组(阵发性AF分别为93%对76%,持续性AF分别为78%对48%)。
对于AF的治疗,使用大型Lasso导管进行节段性前庭PVI比口部PVI更有效且更安全。