Podnar Simon
Institute of Clinical Neurophysiology, Division of Neurology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, SI-1525 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Jul;118(7):1423-37. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.01.022. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
The nervous system structures involved in the control of the lower urinary tract (LUT) are usually divided using a neuroanatomical classification system into suprapontine, pontine, spinal and sacral. In all patients with LUT symptoms, after exclusion of local causes, a nervous system disorder needs to be considered. For the diagnosis of neurogenic LUT disorders, in addition to clinical assessment, neurophysiologic testing might be useful. Imaging and other laboratory studies (e.g., cystometry) often provide relevant additional information. Neurophysiologic tests are more useful in patients with sacral compared with suprasacral disorders. Although in patients with LUT disorders external urethral sphincter (EUS) electromyography (EMG) would seem the most appropriate, anal sphincter EMG is the single most useful diagnostic test, particularly for focal sacral lesions, and atypical parkinsonism. Another clinically useful method that tests the sacral segments, and complements EMG, is the sacral (penilo/clitoro-cavernosus) reflex. Kinesiologic EMG is useful to demonstrate detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (i.e., increased EUS activity during bladder contraction), which is particularly common in spinal cord disease. Somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) and motor evoked potential (MEP) studies (cortical and lumbar) may be useful to diagnose clinically silent central lesions. MEP, in addition, seems to be very promising in research into cortical excitability. Theoretically, cortical SEP on bladder/urethra stimulation would be much more useful than pudendal SEP because it tests thin nerve afferents from the pelvic viscera. However, the utility of this technique is limited by technical difficulties, which can be partially overcome by the concomitant recording of a palmar sympathetic skin response (SSR). SSR recorded from the saddle region is also useful for testing the lumbosacral sympathetic system. Although the technique of detrusor EMG has been recently described in humans, a clinically useful test for evaluating the sacral parasympathetic system, which is crucial for LUT functioning, is still lacking.
参与控制下尿路(LUT)的神经系统结构通常使用神经解剖学分类系统分为脑桥上、脑桥、脊髓和骶部。在所有有LUT症状的患者中,排除局部病因后,需要考虑神经系统疾病。对于神经源性LUT疾病的诊断,除了临床评估外,神经生理学检测可能有用。影像学和其他实验室检查(如膀胱测压)通常可提供相关的额外信息。与骶上疾病相比,神经生理学检测在骶部疾病患者中更有用。虽然在LUT疾病患者中,尿道外括约肌(EUS)肌电图(EMG)似乎是最合适的,但肛门括约肌EMG是最有用的单项诊断检测,特别是对于局灶性骶部病变和非典型帕金森病。另一种检测骶段并补充EMG的临床有用方法是骶部(阴茎/阴蒂海绵体)反射。运动学EMG有助于证明逼尿肌括约肌协同失调(即膀胱收缩时EUS活动增加),这在脊髓疾病中尤为常见。体感诱发电位(SEP)和运动诱发电位(MEP)研究(皮质和腰椎)可能有助于诊断临床上无症状的中枢病变。此外,MEP在研究皮质兴奋性方面似乎非常有前景。理论上,膀胱/尿道刺激时的皮质SEP比阴部SEP更有用,因为它检测来自盆腔内脏的细神经传入纤维。然而,该技术的实用性受到技术困难的限制,通过同时记录手掌交感皮肤反应(SSR)可部分克服这些困难。从鞍区记录的SSR也可用于检测腰骶交感神经系统。虽然最近已在人体中描述了逼尿肌EMG技术,但仍缺乏一种临床上有用的检测方法来评估对LUT功能至关重要的骶部副交感神经系统。