Salvarani Carlo, Macchioni PierLuigi, Manzini Carlo, Paolazzi Giuseppe, Trotta Aldo, Manganelli Paolo, Cimmino Marco, Gerli Roberto, Catanoso Maria Grazia, Boiardi Luigi, Cantini Fabrizio, Klersy Catherine, Hunder Gene G
Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Ann Intern Med. 2007 May 1;146(9):631-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-9-200705010-00005.
A reliable alternative to steroids for treating polymyalgia rheumatica has not yet been identified. Although infliximab has been used occasionally in steroid-resistant cases, its efficacy has not been demonstrated in a controlled study.
To compare the efficacy of prednisone plus infliximab with that of prednisone plus placebo in patients with newly diagnosed polymyalgia rheumatica.
Randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
7 rheumatology clinics in Italy.
51 patients with newly diagnosed polymyalgia rheumatica. Patients with associated giant cell arteritis and those who had been previously treated with steroids or biological or immunosuppressive agents were excluded.
Initial therapy with oral prednisone tapered from 15 mg/d to 0 mg/d over 16 weeks according to a standard protocol, plus infusions of placebo or infliximab, 3 mg/kg of body weight, at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14, and 22.
The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients without relapse or recurrence through week 52. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients no longer taking prednisone, the number of relapses and recurrences, the duration of prednisone therapy, and the cumulative prednisone dose.
Four patients (3 in the infliximab group and 1 in the placebo group) did not complete the trial. The proportion of patients who were free of relapse and recurrence at 52 weeks did not differ between groups (6 of 20 patients [30%] in the infliximab group vs. 10 of 27 patients [37%] in the placebo group; adjusted risk difference, -3 percentage points [95% CI, -31 to 24 percentage points]; P = 0.80). In a sensitivity analysis that included dropouts, the best-case scenario yielded a difference of 5 percentage points (CI, -21 to 31 percentage points) between the groups. The secondary outcomes at weeks 22 and 52 did not differ between the groups.
The study had a small sample and a short follow-up. A low dosage of infliximab was used, and the prednisone dosage was rapidly tapered.
Although too small to be definitive, the trial provides evidence that adding infliximab to prednisone for treating newly diagnosed polymyalgia rheumatica is of no benefit and may be harmful. If there is benefit, it is unlikely to be large. Australian Clinical Trials Registry number: ACTRN012606000205538.
治疗风湿性多肌痛的可靠类固醇替代药物尚未确定。尽管英夫利昔单抗偶尔用于类固醇抵抗病例,但其疗效尚未在对照研究中得到证实。
比较泼尼松联合英夫利昔单抗与泼尼松联合安慰剂治疗新诊断的风湿性多肌痛患者的疗效。
随机、安慰剂对照试验。
意大利的7个风湿病诊所。
51例新诊断的风湿性多肌痛患者。排除合并巨细胞动脉炎以及既往接受过类固醇、生物制剂或免疫抑制剂治疗的患者。
根据标准方案,口服泼尼松初始剂量为15mg/d,在16周内逐渐减至0mg/d,同时在第0、2、6、14和22周静脉输注安慰剂或3mg/kg体重的英夫利昔单抗。
主要疗效终点是至第52周无复发或再发的患者比例。次要结局包括不再服用泼尼松的患者比例、复发和再发次数、泼尼松治疗持续时间以及泼尼松累积剂量。
4例患者(英夫利昔单抗组3例,安慰剂组1例)未完成试验。两组在52周时无复发和再发的患者比例无差异(英夫利昔单抗组20例患者中有6例[30%],安慰剂组27例患者中有10例[37%];校正风险差异为-3个百分点[95%CI,-31至24个百分点];P = 0.80)。在纳入失访患者的敏感性分析中,最佳情况下两组之间的差异为5个百分点(CI,-21至31个百分点)。两组在第22周和52周的次要结局无差异。
本研究样本量小且随访时间短。英夫利昔单抗使用剂量低,泼尼松剂量快速减量。
尽管该试验规模太小无法得出定论,但提供了证据表明,在泼尼松基础上加用英夫利昔单抗治疗新诊断的风湿性多肌痛无益处,甚至可能有害。即便有益处,也不太可能很大。澳大利亚临床试验注册号:ACTRN012606000205538。