Emerson Roberta J, Records Kathie
Intercollegiate College of Nursing/WSU College of Nursing.
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2007;4:Article12. doi: 10.2202/1548-923X.1375. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
Student evaluations of teaching provide administrators an overall picture of the effectiveness of personnel and contribute data for promotion and merit decisions. These evaluations must be assessed for their relevance, validity, and reliability. This paper describes the development process and psychometric testing for clinical (n = 149) and didactic (n = 148) student evaluation of teaching forms for undergraduate and graduate courses in one college of nursing. Validity and reliability results were quite strong for the instruments, both of which evidenced a one-factor solution with factor loadings ranging from .68-.88 and Cronbach's alphas of .96 (Classroom) and .95 (Clinical). The clinical and classroom evaluation tools are relatively short, decreasing the burden on students who need to complete the instruments for multiple instructors in any one semester. Initial testing of the psychometric properties of the tools supports their continued use in colleges of nursing.
学生对教学的评价为管理人员提供了人员有效性的总体情况,并为晋升和绩效决策提供数据。必须对这些评价的相关性、有效性和可靠性进行评估。本文描述了一所护理学院本科和研究生课程的临床(n = 149)和理论教学(n = 148)学生教学评价表的开发过程和心理测量测试。这些工具的效度和信度结果相当理想,二者均呈现单因素解决方案,因子载荷范围为0.68 - 0.88,课堂评价的Cronbach's α系数为0.96,临床评价的为0.95。临床和课堂评价工具相对简短,减轻了在任一学期需要为多名教师填写这些工具的学生的负担。对这些工具心理测量特性的初步测试支持它们在护理学院继续使用。