Barker Donald E, Green John M, Maxwell Robert A, Smith Philip W, Mejia Vicente A, Dart Benjamin W, Cofer Joseph B, Roe S Michael, Burns R Phillip
Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Chattanooga, TN 37403, USA.
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 May;204(5):784-92; discussion 792-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.12.039. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
Temporary closure of an open abdominal wound by vacuum-pack is the method of choice for patients requiring open abdomen management in our institution. We have previously reported our experience with a vacuum-pack in trauma patients and have expanded its use to general and vascular surgery patients.
This is a descriptive study performed through review of medical records of all patients undergoing vacuum-pack closure after celiotomy from January 1999 to May 2006. Clinical and demographic data were collected.
Seven hundred seventeen vacuum-pack closures were performed in 258 surgical patients (116 trauma versus 142 general and vascular surgery). The most common indication for open abdomen management was damage control in trauma patients and planned reexploration in general and vascular surgery patients. Total abdominal complication rate was 15.5% (14.7% trauma versus 16.2% general and vascular surgery). Fistulas occurred in 13 (5%), intraabdominal abscesses in 9 (3.5%), bowel obstruction in 3 (1.2%), abdominal compartment syndrome in 3 (1.2%), and evisceration in 1 (0.4%). Two hundred twenty-six patients survived to permanent abdominal wound closure. Of these, 154 (68.1%) patients underwent primary fascial closure of their abdominal wounds. Seventy-two patients (31.9%) required delayed closure. In-hospital mortality rate was 26.0% (25.9% trauma versus 26.1% general and vascular surgery). The cost of vacuum-pack materials is less than $50.
Indication for open abdomen management varied between general and vascular surgery and trauma patients. Complication rates were similar. Primary closure of open abdominal wounds was achieved in 68.4% of patients. Vacuum-pack temporary abdominal wound closure, initially used in trauma patients, continues to demonstrate ease of mastery, effectiveness in patient care and comfort, consistently low associated complication rate, and low cost in both general and vascular surgery and trauma patients.
在我们机构中,对于需要进行开放性腹部伤口处理的患者,采用负压封闭技术临时闭合开放性腹部伤口是首选方法。我们之前已报道过在创伤患者中应用负压封闭技术的经验,并已将其应用范围扩大至普通外科和血管外科患者。
这是一项描述性研究,通过回顾1999年1月至2006年5月间所有接受剖腹手术后采用负压封闭技术闭合伤口的患者的病历进行。收集了临床和人口统计学数据。
258例手术患者共进行了717次负压封闭技术闭合伤口操作(116例创伤患者,142例普通外科和血管外科患者)。开放性腹部伤口处理最常见的指征在创伤患者中是损伤控制,在普通外科和血管外科患者中是计划性再次探查。腹部总并发症发生率为15.5%(创伤患者为14.7%,普通外科和血管外科患者为16.2%)。发生肠瘘13例(5%),腹腔内脓肿9例(3.5%),肠梗阻3例(1.2%),腹腔间隔室综合征3例(1.2%),脏器脱出1例(0.4%)。226例患者存活至腹部伤口永久性闭合。其中,154例(68.1%)患者的腹部伤口进行了一期筋膜闭合。72例(31.9%)患者需要延迟闭合。住院死亡率为26.0%(创伤患者为25.9%,普通外科和血管外科患者为26.1%)。负压封闭材料的成本低于50美元。
普通外科和血管外科患者与创伤患者在开放性腹部伤口处理的指征方面存在差异。并发症发生率相似。68.4%的患者实现了开放性腹部伤口的一期闭合。负压封闭技术临时闭合腹部伤口最初用于创伤患者,在普通外科、血管外科患者及创伤患者中均持续显示出易于掌握、对患者护理有效且舒适、相关并发症发生率始终较低以及成本低廉的特点。