Dearnaley David P, Sydes Matthew R, Graham John D, Aird Edwin G, Bottomley David, Cowan Richard A, Huddart Robert A, Jose Chakiath C, Matthews John Hl, Millar Jeremy, Moore A Rollo, Morgan Rachel C, Russell J Martin, Scrase Christopher D, Stephens Richard J, Syndikus Isabel, Parmar Mahesh K B
Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospitals, Sutton and London, UK.
Lancet Oncol. 2007 Jun;8(6):475-87. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70143-2.
In men with localised prostate cancer, conformal radiotherapy (CFRT) could deliver higher doses of radiation than does standard-dose conventional radical external-beam radiotherapy, and could improve long-term efficacy, potentially at the cost of increased toxicity. We aimed to present the first analyses of effectiveness from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial.
The MRC RT01 trial included 843 men with localised prostate cancer who were randomly assigned to standard-dose CFRT or escalated-dose CFRT, both administered with neoadjuvant androgen suppression. Primary endpoints were biochemical-progression-free survival (bPFS), freedom from local progression, metastases-free survival, overall survival, and late toxicity scores. The toxicity scores were measured with questionnaires for physicians and patients that included the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), the Late Effects on Normal Tissue: Subjective/Objective/Management (LENT/SOM) scales, and the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA PCI) scales. Analysis was done by intention to treat. This trial is registered at the Current Controlled Trials website http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN47772397.
Between January, 1998, and December, 2002, 843 men were randomly assigned to escalated-dose CFRT (n=422) or standard-dose CFRT (n=421). In the escalated group, the hazard ratio (HR) for bPFS was 0.67 (95% CI 0.53-0.85, p=0.0007). We noted 71% bPFS (108 cumulative events) and 60% bPFS (149 cumulative events) by 5 years in the escalated and standard groups, respectively. HR for clinical progression-free survival was 0.69 (0.47-1.02; p=0.064); local control was 0.65 (0.36-1.18; p=0.16); freedom from salvage androgen suppression was 0.78 (0.57-1.07; p=0.12); and metastases-free survival was 0.74 (0.47-1.18; p=0.21). HR for late bowel toxicity in the escalated group was 1.47 (1.12-1.92) according to the RTOG (grade >/=2) scale; 1.44 (1.16-1.80) according to the LENT/SOM (grade >/=2) scales; and 1.28 (1.03-1.60) according to the UCLA PCI (score >/=30) scale. 33% of the escalated and 24% of the standard group reported late bowel toxicity within 5 years of starting treatment. HR for late bladder toxicity according to the RTOG (grade >/=2) scale was 1.36 (0.90-2.06), but this finding was not supported by the LENT/SOM (grade >/=2) scales (HR 1.07 [0.90-1.29]), nor the UCLA PCI (score >/=30) scale (HR 1.05 [0.81-1.36]).
Escalated-dose CFRT with neoadjuvant androgen suppression seems clinically worthwhile in terms of bPFS, progression-free survival, and decreased use of salvage androgen suppression. This additional efficacy is offset by an increased incidence of longer term adverse events.
对于局限性前列腺癌男性患者,适形放疗(CFRT)能够比标准剂量的传统根治性外照射放疗给予更高剂量的辐射,并可能提高长期疗效,但这可能以增加毒性为代价。我们旨在展示医学研究委员会(MRC)RT01随机对照试验的首次疗效分析。
MRC RT01试验纳入了843例局限性前列腺癌男性患者,他们被随机分配至标准剂量CFRT组或高剂量CFRT组,两组均采用新辅助雄激素抑制治疗。主要终点为无生化进展生存期(bPFS)、无局部进展生存期、无转移生存期、总生存期以及晚期毒性评分。毒性评分通过针对医生和患者的问卷进行测量,这些问卷包括放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)、正常组织晚期效应:主观/客观/管理(LENT/SOM)量表以及加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校前列腺癌指数(UCLA PCI)量表。分析采用意向性治疗原则。该试验已在当前对照试验网站http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN47772397注册。
在1998年1月至2002年12月期间,843例男性患者被随机分配至高剂量CFRT组(n = 422)或标准剂量CFRT组(n = 421)。在高剂量组中,bPFS的风险比(HR)为0.67(95%CI 0.53 - 0.85,p = 0.0007)。我们注意到,高剂量组和标准剂量组在5年时的bPFS分别为71%(108例累积事件)和60%(149例累积事件)。临床无进展生存期的HR为0.69(0.47 - 1.02;p = 0.064);局部控制率的HR为0.65(0.36 - 1.18;p = 0.16);无需挽救性雄激素抑制的HR为0.78(0.57 - 1.07;p = 0.12);无转移生存期的HR为0.74(0.47 - 1.18;p = 0.21)。根据RTOG(≥2级)量表,高剂量组晚期肠道毒性的HR为1.47(1.12 - 1.92);根据LENT/SOM(≥2级)量表为1.44(1.16 - 1.80);根据UCLA PCI(得分≥30)量表为1.28(1.03 - 1.60)。在开始治疗的5年内,高剂量组和标准剂量组分别有33%和24%的患者报告了晚期肠道毒性。根据RTOG(≥2级)量表,晚期膀胱毒性的HR为1.36(0.90 - 2.06),但该结果未得到LENT/SOM(≥2级)量表(HR 1.07 [0.90 - 1.29])和UCLA PCI(得分≥30)量表(HR 1.05 [0.81 - 1.36])的支持。
新辅助雄激素抑制联合高剂量CFRT在bPFS、无进展生存期以及减少挽救性雄激素抑制的使用方面似乎在临床上是值得的。这种额外的疗效被长期不良事件发生率的增加所抵消。