Ozbaydar Mehmet Uğur, Tonbul Murat, Baca Emre, Yalaman Okan
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology (Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kliniği), Istanbul Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2007;41(2):120-6.
We evaluated patients who underwent arthroscopic repair for posttraumatic, recurrent anterior-inferior glenohumeral instability with capsular laxity.
Seventeen patients (4 females, 13 males; mean age 27 years; range 18 to 40 years) were treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair and posterior capsular plication for posttraumatic, recurrent anterior-inferior glenohumeral instability with capsular laxity. Involvement was on the right side in 11 patients, and on the left in six patients. The mean duration from the first dislocation to surgery was 5.2 years (range 1 to 11 years). All the patients received conservative treatment before surgery. Range of motion was measured with a goniometer and muscle strength was measured manually. Apprehension test, Jobe apprehension-relocation test, and posterior apprehension test were used to assess instability. Preoperatively, all the patients were examined by anteroposterior and axillary radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging. Shoulder functions were assessed with the Rowe rating scale for Bankart repairs. The mean follow-up was 35.6 months (range 24 to 50 months).
Instability recurred in three patients (17.7%). The Rowe score increased from a mean of 41 (range 15-45) to 78 (range 43-100) postoperatively. Functional results were excellent-good in 13 patients (76.5%), fair in one patient (5.9%), and poor in three patients (17.7%). One patient underwent arthroscopic revision following redislocation. Pre- and postoperative values for active forward flexion, external rotation, and internal rotation did not differ significantly (p>0.05).
The results of arthroscopic Bankart repair and posterior capsular plication are satisfactory in the treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability with capsular laxity. However, the use of capsular plication with arthroscopic Bankart repair should be considered in selected cases.
我们评估了因创伤后复发性下盂肱关节前下方不稳定伴关节囊松弛而接受关节镜修复的患者。
17例患者(4例女性,13例男性;平均年龄27岁;年龄范围18至40岁)因创伤后复发性下盂肱关节前下方不稳定伴关节囊松弛接受关节镜下Bankart修复和后关节囊折叠术。11例患者累及右侧,6例累及左侧。首次脱位至手术的平均时间为5.2年(范围1至11年)。所有患者在手术前均接受了保守治疗。使用角度计测量活动范围,手动测量肌肉力量。采用恐惧试验、Jobe恐惧-复位试验和后恐惧试验评估不稳定情况。术前,所有患者均接受前后位和腋位X线片及磁共振成像检查。采用Rowe评分量表评估Bankart修复的肩部功能。平均随访时间为35.6个月(范围24至50个月)。
3例患者(17.7%)出现不稳定复发。术后Rowe评分从平均41分(范围15 - 45分)提高到78分(范围43 - 100分)。13例患者(76.5%)功能结果为优-良,1例患者(5.9%)为中,3例患者(17.7%)为差。1例患者在再次脱位后接受了关节镜翻修手术。主动前屈、外旋和内旋的术前和术后值无显著差异(p>0.05)。
关节镜下Bankart修复和后关节囊折叠术治疗下盂肱关节前下方不稳定伴关节囊松弛的效果令人满意。然而,在某些特定病例中应考虑将关节囊折叠术与关节镜下Bankart修复联合使用。