Suppr超能文献

患者期望心理健康服务系统如何行动?检验世界卫生组织的响应性概念在精神卫生保健中的适用性。

How do patients expect the mental health service system to act? Testing the WHO responsiveness concept for its appropriateness in mental health care.

作者信息

Bramesfeld Anke, Klippel Ulrike, Seidel Gabriele, Schwartz Friedrich W, Dierks Marie-Luise

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2007 Sep;65(5):880-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.056. Epub 2007 May 9.

Abstract

The World Health Organisation (WHO) concept of responsiveness has been defined as a measure of how well the health system responds to the population's legitimate expectations of non-health aspects of health care provision. It comprises eight domains: dignity, prompt attention, autonomy, choice of health care provider, clear communication, confidentiality, quality of basic amenities, and access to social support networks. The concept is of particular relevance to mental health care systems because of the specific dependency and vulnerability of their users. We tested its applicability to mental health care with five focus groups of experienced mental health care users in Hannover, Germany. The focus groups revealed 492 statements about users' expectations in mental health care. Most concerned attention (115), dignity (108) and autonomy (86). The quotations were assigned to the eight responsiveness domains. In addition, the domain of prompt attention was extended and renamed attention, and the new domain continuity was created. The findings correspond with the literature on health care expectations of non-mental health patients, but differ slightly from the results of a WHO study on overall health care responsiveness. The need for widening the concept of continuity and extending the attention domain reflects the nature of mental health care of providing predominately long-term care. Our analysis indicates the feasibility of the responsiveness concept (if altered as proposed) as a tool for assessing the quality of mental health service from the users' point of view. It should also be further developed to quantitatively evaluate mental health care systems and to benchmark system performance.

摘要

世界卫生组织(WHO)对反应性的概念定义为衡量卫生系统对民众在医疗服务非健康方面合理期望的响应程度。它包括八个领域:尊严、及时关注、自主性、医疗服务提供者的选择、清晰沟通、保密性、基本设施质量以及获得社会支持网络。由于精神卫生保健系统的使用者具有特殊的依赖性和脆弱性,该概念与精神卫生保健系统尤为相关。我们在德国汉诺威对五个由有经验的精神卫生保健使用者组成的焦点小组进行测试,以检验其在精神卫生保健中的适用性。这些焦点小组揭示了492条关于使用者在精神卫生保健方面期望的陈述。大多数涉及关注(115条)、尊严(108条)和自主性(86条)。这些引述被归入八个反应性领域。此外,及时关注领域得到扩展并重新命名为关注,同时创建了新的连续性领域。研究结果与关于非精神卫生患者医疗期望的文献相符,但与世界卫生组织一项关于整体医疗反应性的研究结果略有不同。扩大连续性概念和扩展关注领域的必要性反映了精神卫生保健主要提供长期护理的性质。我们的分析表明,反应性概念(如提议的那样进行修改)作为从使用者角度评估精神卫生服务质量的工具具有可行性。它还应进一步发展,以对精神卫生保健系统进行定量评估并为系统绩效设定基准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验