Huang Georgeanna J, Bajaj Anureet K, Gupta Subhas, Petersen Floyd, Miles Duncan A G
Loma Linda, Calif.; and Cincinnati, Ohio From the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University; Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, University of Cincinnati; and the Health Research Consulting Group, Loma Linda University School of Public Health.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Apr 1;119(4):1319-1325. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000254529.51696.43.
Abdominoplasty is associated with a 1.1 percent risk of deep venous thrombosis. This has been attributed to rectus plication causing intraabdominal hypertension, known to effect decreased venous return, venous stasis, and thus thrombosis. The authors conducted a pilot study to determine which components of the abdominoplasty procedure (i.e., general anesthesia, flexion of the bed, plication, and/or binder placement) may elevate intraabdominal pressures and whether this was clinically relevant.
Twelve abdominoplasty and 10 breast reduction (control) patients were enrolled prospectively. Intraabdominal pressure was transduced through the bladder before plication in the supine and flexed positions, after plication in both positions, after skin closure in the flexed position, and on postoperative day 1 with and without a binder in the flexed position.
All intraabdominal pressures measured were clinically insignificant (<20 mm Hg). A statistically significant increase was found from flexion of the bed (mean difference, 3.80 +/- 2.0, p < 0.001, in the control group; and 4.39 +/- 1.68, p < 0.001, in the study group); rectus plication (mean difference, 2.78 +/- 2.11, p = 0.001, in the supine position; and 2.03 +/- 2.48, p = 0.016, in the flexed position); and binder placement (2.63 mm Hg for no binder versus 4.5 mm Hg with binder, p = 0.004). Both groups also showed an increase from preoperative to skin closure (mean difference, 2.03 +/- 6.7, p = 0.035, for the control group; and 2.83 +/- 3.97, p = 0.031, for the study group), suggesting general anesthesia as a risk factor.
This study confirms the effect of rectus plication on increasing intraabdominal pressures but also implicates bed position, binder placement, and general anesthetic as risk factors. A larger study is needed to clarify the role of these variables in elevating intraabdominal pressure during abdominoplasty.
腹壁成形术与深静脉血栓形成的风险为1.1%相关。这归因于腹直肌折叠导致腹内高压,已知会影响静脉回流减少、静脉淤滞,进而导致血栓形成。作者进行了一项前瞻性试点研究,以确定腹壁成形术的哪些步骤(即全身麻醉、床体弯曲、折叠和/或使用腹带)可能会升高腹内压,以及这是否具有临床相关性。
前瞻性纳入12例行腹壁成形术患者和10例行乳房缩小术(对照组)患者。在仰卧位和弯曲位折叠前、两个位置折叠后、弯曲位皮肤缝合后以及术后第1天,在有和没有腹带的弯曲位通过膀胱测量腹内压。
所有测量的腹内压在临床上均无显著意义(<20 mmHg)。发现床体弯曲(对照组平均差异为3.80±2.0,p<0.001;研究组为4.39±1.68,p<0.001)、腹直肌折叠(仰卧位平均差异为2.78±2.11,p = 0.001;弯曲位为2.03±2.48,p = 0.016)以及使用腹带(未使用腹带时为2.63 mmHg,使用腹带时为4.5 mmHg,p = 0.004)均有统计学显著升高。两组从术前到皮肤缝合也均有升高(对照组平均差异为2.03±6.7,p = 0.035;研究组为2.83±3.97,p = 0.031),提示全身麻醉为一个风险因素。
本研究证实了腹直肌折叠对升高腹内压的作用,但也表明体位、腹带使用和全身麻醉是风险因素。需要进行更大规模的研究来阐明这些变量在腹壁成形术期间升高腹内压中的作用。