García-Vera María Paz, Sanz Jesús, Labrador Francisco J
Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Psicología Clínica, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Clin Exp Hypertens. 2007 Apr;29(3):175-88. doi: 10.1080/10641960701361577.
This study sought to determine whether patients with white-coat or isolated clinic hypertension (ICH) show, in comparison to patients with sustained hypertension (SH), a defense response pattern to novel stimuli and an enhanced psychophysiological reactivity to stress. Forty-three patients with essential hypertension were divided into two groups after 16 days of self-monitoring blood pressure (BP): ICH (24 men; self-measured BP < 135/85 mmHg) and SH (19 men; self-measured BP >or= 135/85 mmHg). Defense responses were measured as the cardiac changes to phasic non-aversive auditory stimuli. Psychophysiological reactivity (heart and breath rate, blood volume pulse, electromyography, and skin conductance) was measured during mental arithmetic and video game tasks. The standard deviation of self-measured BPs and the difference between mean BPs at work and at home were used as indicators of cardiovascular reactivity to daily stress. No significant differences were seen in defense responses or psychophysiological reactivity to laboratory or naturally occurring stressors. These results do not support the hypothesis that ICH can be explained in terms of a generalized hyperreactivity to novel or stressful stimuli.
本研究旨在确定与持续性高血压(SH)患者相比,白大衣高血压或孤立性诊室高血压(ICH)患者是否对新刺激表现出防御反应模式,以及对应激的心理生理反应增强。43例原发性高血压患者在进行16天的血压自我监测后被分为两组:ICH组(24名男性;自测血压<135/85 mmHg)和SH组(19名男性;自测血压≥135/85 mmHg)。防御反应通过对阶段性非厌恶听觉刺激的心脏变化来测量。在进行心算和电子游戏任务期间测量心理生理反应(心率、呼吸频率、血容量脉搏、肌电图和皮肤电导率)。自测血压的标准差以及工作和家中平均血压之间的差值被用作心血管对日常应激反应的指标。在对实验室或自然发生的应激源的防御反应或心理生理反应方面未观察到显著差异。这些结果不支持ICH可以用对新刺激或应激刺激的普遍反应过度来解释这一假设。