Johnson Hilary L, Stauber Jenny L, Adams Merrin S, Jolley Dianne F
Centre for Environmental Contaminants Research, CSIRO Land and Water, Private Mail Bag 7, Bangor, New South Wales, Australia.
Environ Toxicol. 2007 Jun;22(3):234-44. doi: 10.1002/tox.20265.
Current toxicity tests with microalgae are often criticized as being overly sensitive to metals because algae are cultured in metal-deficient media. If such bioassays overestimate copper toxicity in surface waters, the relevance of water quality guidelines derived from these tests is questionable. In this study, the effect of acclimation to copper at environmentally relevant concentrations, on the sensitivity of the marine diatom Nitzschia closterium and the freshwater green alga Chlorella sp. to copper and zinc was examined. N. closterium was acclimated in culture medium containing 5 or 25 microg Cu L(-1) for 200 days, while Chlorella sp. was acclimated in medium containing 2 microg Cu L(-1) for 100 days. Changes in algal growth rates and copper and zinc tolerance were monitored using standard growth inhibition toxicity tests in minimal medium over 72 h. Neither of the two acclimated N. closterium cultures had increased zinc or copper tolerance compared with that of the nonacclimated algae, nor were there any changes in control growth rates. Similarly, no changes in copper tolerance or control growth rates were observed for the acclimated Chlorella sp. culture. This was supported by measurements of intracellular and extracellular copper which confirmed that there were no differences in copper accumulation in either acclimated or nonacclimated algae. These results suggest that these algae grown in standard culture media are generally no more sensitive than algae grown in a metal-enriched medium. This supports the continued use of current laboratory bioassays with microalgae, as part of a suite of tests for assessing metal bioavailability, for use in ecological risk assessments and for providing data for the derivation of water quality guidelines.
目前针对微藻的毒性测试常遭批评,认为其对金属过于敏感,因为藻类是在缺金属的培养基中培养的。如果此类生物测定高估了地表水中铜的毒性,那么基于这些测试得出的水质准则的相关性就值得怀疑。在本研究中,考察了在环境相关浓度下适应铜对海洋硅藻菱形藻(Nitzschia closterium)和淡水绿藻小球藻(Chlorella sp.)对铜和锌敏感性的影响。菱形藻在含有5或25微克/升铜的培养基中适应200天,而小球藻在含有2微克/升铜的培养基中适应100天。通过在基本培养基中进行72小时的标准生长抑制毒性测试,监测藻类生长速率以及对铜和锌耐受性的变化。与未适应的藻类相比,两种适应后的菱形藻培养物对锌或铜的耐受性均未增加,对照生长速率也没有变化。同样,适应后的小球藻培养物在铜耐受性或对照生长速率方面也未观察到变化。细胞内和细胞外铜的测量结果支持了这一点,证实适应和未适应的藻类在铜积累方面没有差异。这些结果表明,在标准培养基中生长的这些藻类通常并不比在富含金属的培养基中生长的藻类更敏感。这支持继续将当前针对微藻的实验室生物测定作为评估金属生物可利用性的一系列测试的一部分,用于生态风险评估并为推导水质准则提供数据。