Mösges Ralph, Domröse Christian M, Löffler Jürgen
Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Lindenburger Allee 42, 50931 Cologne, Germany.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Sep;264(9):1087-94. doi: 10.1007/s00405-007-0314-0. Epub 2007 May 15.
The study was designed to investigate the potential contribution of hydrocortisone acetate to the efficacy and safety of an antibiotics ointment in the treatment of acute otitis externa (AOE). In a double-blind study 151 patients with a unilateral acute bacterial otitis externa were randomized either to receive an ointment with polymyxin-B sulfate (7,500 I.E./g) + bacitracin (300 I.E./g) alone (AB) or the same antibiotic ointment with 10 mg hydrocortisone acetate/g ointment (AB + HC). Primary efficacy endpoint was the change of an aggregate clinical symptom score (CSS) (subscores: redness, swelling, pain and secretion) found at Visit 2 versus baseline (Visit 1). Secondary outcome parameters were the change of the CSS from Visit 1 to the study termination, and the changes in the subscores and of a visual analog scale for pain. In the group treated with AB + HC, significantly more patients with severe redness [14 (56%) vs. 7 (28%), P = 0.045] or severe secretion [23 (70%) vs. 10 (40%), P = 0.024] at inclusion were symptom-free at the last visit. Fewer pain-relieving tablets (1.1 +/- 2.2 vs. 2.3 +/- 4.6 paracetamol tablets) were used in the AB + HC-group. In the steroid group there was a slightly larger though not significant reduction in CSS at Visit 2 and Visit 3 versus baseline. Similar results were documented for redness, pain and secretion. No serious adverse events occurred. Both ointments are effective and safe in the topical treatment of AOE. Hydrocortisone acetate combined with the antibiotics improved individual symptoms better as did the steroid-free ointment.
本研究旨在调查醋酸氢化可的松对一种抗生素软膏治疗急性外耳道炎(AOE)的疗效和安全性的潜在作用。在一项双盲研究中,151例单侧急性细菌性外耳道炎患者被随机分为两组,一组单独接受含硫酸多粘菌素B(7500国际单位/g)+杆菌肽(300国际单位/g)的软膏(AB组),另一组接受含10mg醋酸氢化可的松/g软膏的相同抗生素软膏(AB + HC组)。主要疗效终点是第2次就诊时与基线(第1次就诊)相比综合临床症状评分(CSS)(子评分:发红、肿胀、疼痛和分泌物)的变化。次要结局参数是从第1次就诊到研究结束时CSS的变化,以及子评分和疼痛视觉模拟量表的变化。在AB + HC组治疗的患者中,纳入时严重发红[14例(56%)对7例(28%),P = 0.045]或严重分泌物[23例(70%)对10例(40%),P = 0.02]的患者在最后一次就诊时无症状。AB + HC组使用的止痛片较少(1.1±2.2对2.3±4.6片扑热息痛)。在类固醇组中,第2次和第3次就诊时与基线相比CSS的降低略大,但不显著。发红、疼痛和分泌物方面也有类似结果。未发生严重不良事件。两种软膏在AOE的局部治疗中均有效且安全。与不含类固醇的软膏相比,醋酸氢化可的松与抗生素联合使用能更好地改善个体症状。