Suppr超能文献

利培酮与传统抗精神病药治疗精神分裂症和分裂情感障碍的比较:在常规临床治疗下的症状、生活质量和资源利用情况。

Risperidone versus Conventional Antipsychotics for Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder : Symptoms, Quality of Life and Resource Use under Customary Clinical Care.

机构信息

Risperidone Outcome Study of Effectiveness (ROSE) Group, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Titusville, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

Clin Drug Investig. 2004;24(5):275-86. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200424050-00004.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively compare risperidone with conventional antipsychotic agents among schizophrenia patients treated under usual practice conditions.

DESIGN

One-year, multicentre, open-label, randomised trial carried out in 21 centres in 17 states of the US.

PATIENTS

684 patients were followed from 1995 to 1997, and must have experienced a symptom relapse at study start.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to risperidone therapy or their physician's 'best choice' of any one of the 13 conventional antipsychotic medications approved in the US.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS

Outcomes measured were changes in psychiatric symptoms, side effects, satisfaction with drug therapy, quality of life (including health-related quality of life [HRQOL]) and resource utilisation. A subgroup analysis of the non-switchers was also conducted. Irrespective of treatment group, treatment switching and days with no drug therapy were observed. Compared with patients on conventional antipsychotics, those in the risperidone group achieved statistically superior scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) [PANSS total score improved from 83.32 to 61.80 vs 81.42 to 66.99 in the risperidone and conventional groups, respectively), Barnes Akathisia Scale (scores improved from 0.89 to 0.55 vs 0.87 to 0.81 in the risperidone and conventional groups, respectively), and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) scale (scores improved from 32.83 to 39.92 vs 32.55 to 37.22 in the risperidone and conventional groups, respectively) during the 1-year treatment period. A significantly higher percentage of risperidone- treated patients had a 60% improvement in PANSS scores at 12 months (20.9% of patients compared with 10.7% in the risperidone and conventional groups, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in resource utilisation between the two groups. Among non-switchers, patients in the risperidone group had lower total costs and more clinical benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

Conditions of usual practice resulted in a high degree of non-treatment, treatment changing and multi-antipsychotic drug therapy. Patients in the risperidone group had better clinical outcomes (e.g. reduced psychiatric symptoms and side effects) and improved HRQOL. There were no significant differences in healthcare utilisation between the two study groups.

摘要

目的

前瞻性比较利培酮与传统抗精神病药物在常规治疗条件下治疗精神分裂症患者的疗效。

设计

在美国 17 个州的 21 个中心进行的为期 1 年、多中心、开放标签、随机试验。

患者

1995 年至 1997 年期间随访了 684 例患者,且在研究开始时必须经历症状复发。

干预措施

患者被随机分配接受利培酮治疗或他们的医生选择的美国批准的 13 种传统抗精神病药物中的任何一种“最佳选择”。

主要观察指标和结果

测量的结果是精神症状、副作用、药物治疗满意度、生活质量(包括健康相关生活质量[HRQOL])和资源利用的变化。还对非转换患者进行了亚组分析。无论治疗组如何,都观察到了治疗转换和无药物治疗天数。与接受传统抗精神病药物治疗的患者相比,利培酮组的精神分裂症阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)[PANSS 总分从 83.32 分改善至 61.80 分,而利培酮和常规组分别为 81.42 分改善至 66.99 分]、巴恩斯静坐不能量表(评分从 0.89 分改善至 0.55 分,利培酮和常规组分别为 0.87 分改善至 0.81 分)和 36 项简短健康调查(SF-36)量表(评分从 32.83 分改善至 39.92 分,利培酮和常规组分别为 32.55 分改善至 37.22 分)在 1 年治疗期间。在 12 个月时,利培酮治疗的患者中有 20.9%(与利培酮和常规组分别为 10.7%)的患者 PANSS 评分改善 60%,这一比例显著更高。两组之间的资源利用没有统计学上的显著差异。在非转换患者中,利培酮组的总费用更低,临床获益更多。

结论

常规治疗条件导致高度的非治疗、治疗转换和多种抗精神病药物治疗。利培酮组患者的临床结局更好(例如,精神症状和副作用减少),且 HRQOL 得到改善。两组患者的医疗保健利用无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验