Vujanovic Anka A, Arrindell Willem A, Bernstein Amit, Norton Peter J, Zvolensky Michael J
University of Vermont, VT 05405-0314, USA.
Assessment. 2007 Jun;14(2):129-43. doi: 10.1177/1073191106295053.
The present investigation examined the factor structure, internal consistency, and construct validity of the 16-item Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI; Reiss Peterson, Gursky, & McNally 1986) in a young adult sample (n = 420) from the Netherlands. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to comparatively evaluate two-factor, three-factor, and four-factor models of the anxiety sensitivity construct. Support was found for a hierarchical structure of anxiety sensitivity, with one global higher-order factor and four lower-order factors. Internal consistency for the global and lower-order factors of the 16-item ASI was adequate. Convergent and discriminant associations between the 16-item ASI and general mood and panic-specific variables were consistent with anxiety sensitivity theory. In addition, incremental validity of the anxiety sensitivity construct was established, relative to negative affectivity, for unexpected panic attacks and agoraphobic avoidance.
本研究在来自荷兰的一个年轻成人样本(n = 420)中,检验了16项焦虑敏感性指数(ASI;Reiss、Peterson、Gursky和McNally,1986)的因子结构、内部一致性和结构效度。验证性因子分析用于比较评估焦虑敏感性结构的两因子、三因子和四因子模型。研究发现支持焦虑敏感性的层次结构,即一个总体高阶因子和四个低阶因子。16项ASI的总体和低阶因子的内部一致性良好。16项ASI与一般情绪及惊恐特异性变量之间的聚合和区分关联与焦虑敏感性理论一致。此外,相对于消极情感性,焦虑敏感性结构对于意外惊恐发作和场所恐惧回避具有增量效度。
J Anxiety Disord. 2007
J Anxiety Disord. 2009-8
J Psychiatr Res. 2009-1
Assessment. 2011-12-6
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2025-4-21
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2021