Hermes-Lima Marcelo, Santos Natacha C F, Alencastro Antonieta C R, Ferreira Sergio T
Oxyradical Research Group, Depto. Biologia Celular, Universidade de Brasília. Brasília, DF, Brazil.
IUBMB Life. 2007 Apr-May;59(4-5):199-210. doi: 10.1080/15216540701258751.
Science in Latin America has experienced vigorous growth in the past decade, as demonstrated by the fact that the Latin American share of the world's scientific publications increased from 1.8% in 1991-1995 to 3.4% in 1999-2003. Significant growth has also taken place in the numbers of PhDs in science and engineering (S&E) awarded in Latin American countries in recent years, including those in the natural sciences. Importantly, albeit at different rates, growth has been verified in almost all countries in the region, indicating a general effort to promote the development of S&E. In most research fields, however, the recognition or relative impact of Latin American science, as measured by the average number of citations received by published articles (CpP), is still below world averages and much lower than in developed nations. We show that average CpP values for a set of 34 representative developing and developed countries correlate significantly with gross expenditure in research and development (GERD), with gross domestic product (GDP) per capita and with the number of researchers per million inhabitants (RpM). Among those countries, Latin American nations present some of the lowest average values of CpP (<6), GERD (< or =1% of GDP) and RpM (<2,000). We also examined recent trends in scientific activity in Latin America, with focus on the natural sciences and on biochemistry and molecular biology (BMB). In terms of citation scores, publications in BMB compare favorably to those in other research fields within Latin America. At the same time, however, Latin American BMB is one of the areas for which relative impact--compared to developed nations or normalized to world averages--is lowest. These observations clearly indicate the need to establish effective policies to increase competitiveness in terms of the quality and international recognition of Latin American natural sciences in general, and BMB in particular, as opposed to merely increasing the absolute numbers of publications or the numbers of PhDs awarded in the region.
在过去十年中,拉丁美洲的科学事业经历了蓬勃发展,这一事实表明,拉丁美洲在世界科学出版物中所占的份额从1991 - 1995年的1.8%增至1999 - 2003年的3.4%。近年来,拉丁美洲国家授予的科学与工程领域博士学位数量也有显著增长,包括自然科学领域。重要的是,尽管增长速度各异,但该地区几乎所有国家都实现了增长,这表明各国普遍在努力推动科学与工程的发展。然而,在大多数研究领域,以已发表文章的平均被引次数(CpP)衡量,拉丁美洲科学的认可度或相对影响力仍低于世界平均水平,且远低于发达国家。我们发现,34个有代表性的发展中国家和发达国家的CpP平均值与研发总支出(GERD)、人均国内生产总值(GDP)以及每百万居民中的研究人员数量(RpM)显著相关。在这些国家中,拉丁美洲国家的CpP平均值(<6)、GERD(<或=GDP的1%)和RpM(<2000)处于较低水平。我们还研究了拉丁美洲近期的科学活动趋势,重点关注自然科学以及生物化学与分子生物学(BMB)。就被引分数而言,拉丁美洲BMB领域的出版物与该地区其他研究领域相比表现良好。然而,与此同时,与发达国家相比或与世界平均水平进行标准化后,拉丁美洲BMB领域的相对影响力却是最低的领域之一。这些观察结果清楚地表明,有必要制定有效政策,以提高拉丁美洲自然科学总体上、特别是BMB领域在质量和国际认可度方面的竞争力,而不仅仅是增加该地区的出版物绝对数量或授予的博士学位数量。