Whitehead Lisa Claire
University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Aug;65(4):782-91. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.005. Epub 2007 May 23.
The advantages and disadvantages of using the Internet in both qualitative and quantitative researches in the field of health are readily available in the literature, but little examination has been made of the factors to be considered in developing and running Internet-mediated research. A bibliographic search of English language publications indexed in eight computerized databases (EBSCO, EMBASE, MedLine, PsycInfo, CINAHL, PubMed, Cochrane, and TRIP) was undertaken with no limit set for the data of publication. The keywords Internet, research, quality, credibility, reliability, and validity were used in all possible combinations, and mappings to headings made wherever possible. The search revealed three key areas in setting up and undertaking Internet-mediated research: addressing sampling biases, ensuring ethical practice, and exploring the validity of data collected using an online interface. This paper contributes to the ongoing development of quality standards in the conduct and write-up of Internet-mediated research in the field of health.
健康领域定性和定量研究中使用互联网的优缺点在文献中很容易找到,但对于开展和进行互联网介导研究时需考虑的因素却鲜有探讨。我们在八个计算机化数据库(EBSCO、EMBASE、MedLine、PsycInfo、CINAHL、PubMed、Cochrane和TRIP)中对索引的英文出版物进行了书目检索,对出版日期不设限制。关键词“互联网”“研究”“质量”“可信度”“可靠性”和“有效性”以所有可能的组合方式使用,并尽可能映射到标题。检索结果揭示了开展互联网介导研究的三个关键领域:解决抽样偏差、确保符合道德规范以及探究通过在线界面收集的数据的有效性。本文有助于健康领域互联网介导研究的开展及报告撰写方面质量标准的持续发展。