Freistadt Marion S, Vaccaro Joseph A, Eberle Karen E
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology; Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, USA.
Virol J. 2007 May 24;4:44. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-4-44.
Putative high mutation rates of RNA viruses are believed to mediate undesirable phenomena, such as emergence of drug resistance. However, very little is known about biochemical fidelity rates for viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerases. Using a recently developed in vitro polymerase assay for poliovirus polymerase 3Dpol [Arnold and Cameron (2000) JBC 275:5329], we measured fidelity for each possible mismatch. Polymerase fidelity, in contrast to sequence error rate, is biochemically defined as kpol/Kd of {(correct plus incorrect) divided by incorrect} incorporations, such that a larger value connotes higher fidelity.
To derive kpol/Kd for correct base incorporation, we performed conventional pre-steady state single turnover measurements, yielding values that range from 0.62 to 9.4 microM-1 sec-1. Pre-steady state measurements for incorrect base incorporation were less straightforward: several anomalous phenomena interfered with data collection. To obtain pre-steady state kinetic data for incorrect base incorporation, three strategies were employed. (1) For some incorrect bases, a conventional approach was feasible, although care was taken to ensure that only single turnovers were being assessed. (2) Heparin or unlabeled RNA traps were used to simulate single turnover conditions. (3) Finally, for some incorrect bases, incorporation was so poor that single datapoints were used to provide kinetic estimates. Overall, we found that fidelity for poliovirus polymerase 3Dpol ranges from 1.2 x 10(4) to 1.0 x 10(6) for transition mutations and 3.2 x 10(5) to 4.3 x 10(7) for transversion mutations.
These values are unexpectedly high showing that high RNA virus sequence variation is not due to intrinsically low polymerase fidelity. Based on unusual enzyme behavior that we observed, we speculate that RNA mismatches either directly or indirectly cause enzyme RNA dissociation. If so, high sequence variation of RNA viruses may be due to template-switch RNA recombination and/or unknown fitness/selection phenomena. These findings may lead to a mechanistic understanding of RNA virus error catastrophe and improved anti-viral strategies.
RNA病毒公认的高突变率被认为介导了一些不良现象,如耐药性的出现。然而,对于病毒RNA依赖的RNA聚合酶的生化保真率却知之甚少。利用最近开发的针对脊髓灰质炎病毒聚合酶3Dpol的体外聚合酶测定法[阿诺德和卡梅隆(2000年)《生物化学杂志》275:5329],我们测量了每种可能错配的保真率。与序列错误率相反,聚合酶保真率在生化上定义为{(正确加上错误)除以错误}掺入的kpol/Kd,因此值越大表示保真率越高。
为了得出正确碱基掺入的kpol/Kd,我们进行了传统的稳态前单周转测量,得到的值范围为0.62至9.4微摩尔-1秒-1。错误碱基掺入的稳态前测量不太直接:一些异常现象干扰了数据收集。为了获得错误碱基掺入的稳态前动力学数据,采用了三种策略。(1)对于一些错误碱基,传统方法是可行的,不过要注意确保只评估单周转情况。(2)使用肝素或未标记的RNA陷阱来模拟单周转条件。(3)最后,对于一些错误碱基,掺入情况太差以至于使用单个数据点来提供动力学估计。总体而言,我们发现脊髓灰质炎病毒聚合酶3Dpol的保真率对于转换突变范围为1.2×104至1.0×106,对于颠换突变范围为3.2×105至4.3×107。
这些值出乎意料地高,表明RNA病毒的高序列变异并非由于内在的低聚合酶保真率。基于我们观察到的异常酶行为,我们推测RNA错配直接或间接导致酶与RNA解离。如果是这样,RNA病毒的高序列变异可能是由于模板切换RNA重组和/或未知的适应性/选择现象。这些发现可能会导致对RNA病毒错误灾难的机制性理解以及改进抗病毒策略。