• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于测定移植患者淋巴细胞中西罗莫司水平的检测方法。

An assay for the determination of sirolimus levels in the lymphocyte of transplant patients.

作者信息

Masri M, Rizk S, Barbari A, Stephan A, Kamel G, Rost M

机构信息

Transmedical Research Institute, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2007 May;39(4):1204-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.04.008.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.04.008
PMID:17524933
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Both tacrolimus (TAC) and sirolimus (SRL) bind to the same immunophilin FKBP12; however, their mechanisms of action are distinct. SRL inhibits mammalian target of rapamycin (TOR), which is an enzyme critical to the immune function. TOR inhibition blocks the signal that mediates T-cell proliferation by preventing cell-cycle progression from G1 to S phase. Moreover, TOR inhibition results in a decrease in antibody production by blocking B-cell proliferation and maturation into antibody producing cells. The use of SRL has resulted in a decrease in the number of rejection episodes. As with other immunosuppressive agents, SRL can cause dose-related side effects, the most notable of which are hypercholesterolemia, hyperlipidemia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Thus, therapeutic drug monitoring to assess efficacy and toxicity has became a necessity. SRL blood levels do not correlate with its bioactivity and are affected by the concomitant use of other immunosuppressive drugs. To determine the bioactivity of SRL we have developed an assay to determine the level of Sirolimus per lymphocyte of transplant patients. The levels were correlated with lymphocyte count.

METHODS

Whole blood samples from patients on SRL were collected in Ethylene Diamine Tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) vacutainer tubes. Immediately the lymphocytes from 2 mL of blood were separated using 1.5 mL of Ficoll gradient, by centrifugation for 30 minutes at 2500 RPM. The lymphocytes were washed three times with phosphate-bufferd saline and the pellet suspended in 150 microL of Middle East research institute (MERI) drug extraction solution (Beirut, Lebanon), which was then added to 300 microL of IMx solublizing reagent. The cytoplasmic SRL concentrations in lymphocytes were measured using kits supplied from Abbott diagnostics or by high-performance liquid tomography. A corresponding whole blood sample from each patient was used to measure blood levels. To determine the level per lymphocyte, the value obtained was divided by the number of lymphocytes and expressed as Pg/cell. A pharmacokinetic profile for both blood and lymphocytes was constructed for each patient using data corresponding to predose C(0), 1 hour (C(1)) and 2 hours (C(2)) after the dose. The lymphocyte enumeration for C(0), C(1), and C(2) was performed using the FACS Calibur Flow Cytometer from Becton Dickinson. The average dose was 2.86 +/- 1.27 mg/d with a C(0) = 8.05 +/- 4.24, C(1) = 21.9 +/- 8.9 ng/mL, and C(2) = 23 +/- 0.03 ng/mL. Although there was a significant correlation (P=.0975) between the dose and C(0), there was no correlation between the dose and C(0) level on the lymphocyte count P=.897. However, there was a strong correlation between SRL lymphocyte levels (pg/cell) and the lymphocyte count (r(2)=.6.06). The higher the concentration of the drug the lower the lymphocyte counts. The assay is sensitive to within 0.45 pg/cell, reproducible with a coefficient of variance (CV) of 6.4% within assay and 7.5% for intraassay.

摘要

未标记

他克莫司(TAC)和西罗莫司(SRL)均与同一亲免素FKBP12结合;然而,它们的作用机制不同。SRL抑制雷帕霉素哺乳动物靶点(TOR),这是一种对免疫功能至关重要的酶。TOR抑制通过阻止细胞周期从G1期进展到S期来阻断介导T细胞增殖的信号。此外,TOR抑制通过阻断B细胞增殖和成熟为产生抗体的细胞导致抗体产生减少。SRL的使用导致排斥反应发作次数减少。与其他免疫抑制剂一样,SRL可引起剂量相关的副作用,其中最显著的是高胆固醇血症、高脂血症、贫血和血小板减少症。因此,进行治疗药物监测以评估疗效和毒性已成为必要。SRL血药浓度与其生物活性不相关,且受其他免疫抑制药物联合使用的影响。为了确定SRL的生物活性,我们开发了一种测定移植患者每淋巴细胞中西罗莫司水平的方法。这些水平与淋巴细胞计数相关。

方法

用乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)真空采血管采集接受SRL治疗患者的全血样本。立即用1.5 mL Ficoll梯度从2 mL血液中分离淋巴细胞,以2500 RPM离心30分钟。淋巴细胞用磷酸盐缓冲盐水洗涤三次,沉淀悬浮于150 μL中东研究所(MERI)药物提取溶液(黎巴嫩贝鲁特)中,然后加入300 μL IMx增溶试剂。使用雅培诊断公司提供的试剂盒或通过高效液相层析法测量淋巴细胞中的细胞质SRL浓度。使用来自每位患者的相应全血样本测量血药浓度。为了确定每淋巴细胞的水平,将获得的值除以淋巴细胞数量并表示为Pg/细胞。使用给药前C(0)、给药后1小时(C(1))和2小时(C(2))的数据为每位患者构建血液和淋巴细胞的药代动力学曲线。使用Becton Dickinson公司的FACS Calibur流式细胞仪进行C(0)、C(1)和C(2)的淋巴细胞计数。平均剂量为2.86±1.27 mg/d,C(0)=8.05±4.24,C(1)=21.9±8.9 ng/mL,C(2)=23±0.03 ng/mL。虽然剂量与C(0)之间存在显著相关性(P = 0.0975),但剂量与淋巴细胞计数的C(0)水平之间无相关性(P = 0.897)。然而,SRL淋巴细胞水平(pg/细胞)与淋巴细胞计数之间存在强相关性(r² = 0.606)。药物浓度越高,淋巴细胞计数越低。该测定法对0.45 pg/细胞以内的变化敏感,批内变异系数(CV)为6.4%,批间变异系数为7.5%,具有可重复性。

相似文献

1
An assay for the determination of sirolimus levels in the lymphocyte of transplant patients.一种用于测定移植患者淋巴细胞中西罗莫司水平的检测方法。
Transplant Proc. 2007 May;39(4):1204-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.04.008.
2
Conversion to sirolimus-based maintenance immunosuppression using daclizumab bridge therapy in renal transplant recipients.在肾移植受者中使用达利珠单抗桥接疗法转换为基于西罗莫司的维持性免疫抑制治疗。
Clin Transplant. 2004;18 Suppl 12:61-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2004.00220.x.
3
The pharmacodynamic effect of sirolimus: individual variation of cytokine mRNA expression profiles in human whole blood samples.西罗莫司的药效学作用:人全血样本中细胞因子mRNA表达谱的个体差异。
Immunobiology. 2009;214(1):17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2008.04.002. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
4
Orthotopic liver transplantation using low-dose tacrolimus and sirolimus.使用低剂量他克莫司和西罗莫司的原位肝移植。
Liver Transpl. 2001 Aug;7(8):701-8. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2001.26510.
5
Pharmacokinetic variability of sirolimus in Taiwanese renal transplant recipients.
Transplant Proc. 2004 Sep;36(7):2058-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.09.005.
6
Cyclosporine and sirolimus pharmacokinetics and drug-to-drug interactions in kidney transplant recipients.环孢素和西罗莫司在肾移植受者中的药代动力学和药物相互作用。
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Oct;23(5):625-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2009.00699.x. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
7
A clinical pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus and sirolimus combination immunosuppression comparing simultaneous to separated administration.一项比较他克莫司和西罗莫司联合免疫抑制同时给药与分开给药的临床药代动力学研究。
Ther Drug Monit. 2002 Jun;24(3):346-50. doi: 10.1097/00007691-200206000-00004.
8
Comparison of sirolimus plus tacrolimus versus sirolimus plus cyclosporine in high-risk renal allograft recipients: results from an open-label, randomized trial.西罗莫司联合他克莫司与西罗莫司联合环孢素在高危肾移植受者中的比较:一项开放标签随机试验的结果
Transplantation. 2008 Nov 15;86(9):1187-95. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318187bab0.
9
Assay validation of phosphorylated S6 ribosomal protein for a pharmacodynamic monitoring of mTOR-inhibitors in peripheral human blood.磷酸化 S6 核糖体蛋白检测法用于外周血人源中 mTOR 抑制剂的药效动力学监测。
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2012 May;82(3):151-7. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21005. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
10
Comparison of sirolimus and everolimus in their effects on blood lipid profiles and haematological parameters in heart transplant recipients.西罗莫司与依维莫司对心脏移植受者血脂谱和血液学参数影响的比较。
Clin Transplant. 2007 Jul-Aug;21(4):536-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2007.00686.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A Limited Sampling Strategy to Estimate Exposure of Everolimus in Whole Blood and Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Renal Transplant Recipients Using Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Bayesian Estimators.一种使用群体药代动力学建模和贝叶斯估算器估算肾移植受者全血和外周血单核细胞中依维莫司暴露的有限采样策略。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018 Nov;57(11):1459-1469. doi: 10.1007/s40262-018-0646-5.
2
Could Salivary Cyclosporine Dosage Replace the Whole Blood Cyclosporine Measurements in Renal Transplant Patients?唾液中环孢素剂量能否替代肾移植患者全血中环孢素的测量?
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017 May-Jun;7(3):136-141. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_60_17. Epub 2017 May 22.
3
Alternative matrices for therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive agents using LC-MS/MS.
使用液相色谱-串联质谱法进行免疫抑制剂治疗药物监测的替代基质
Bioanalysis. 2015;7(8):1037-58. doi: 10.4155/bio.15.35.
4
Application of response surface methodology in development of sirolimus liposomes prepared by thin film hydration technique.应用响应面法研制薄膜水化法制备的西罗莫司脂质体。
Bioimpacts. 2013;3(2):75-81. doi: 10.5681/bi.2013.016. Epub 2013 Apr 30.