Suppr超能文献

涉及全酸蚀和自酸蚀粘结剂的粘结剂与牙本质的粘结强度

Bond strength of adhesives to dentin involving total and self-etch adhesives.

作者信息

Hürmüzlü Feridun, Ozdemir A Kemal, Hubbezoglu Ihsan, Coskun Akin, Siso Seyda Hergüner

机构信息

Institute of Odontological Clinic, University of Ferrara, Italy.

出版信息

Quintessence Int. 2007 Apr;38(4):e206-12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Currently, the trend in dentin adhesion seems to be shifting from moist bonding systems to self-etching systems and from several application steps to single steps. However, recent studies have indicated that the performance of single-step adhesives was lower than the 2-step self-etch or total etch systems. In the present study, microtensile bond strength of a total etch, 2-step self-etch and single-step self-etch adhesives was comparatively evaluated.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

The superficial occlusal dentin of 12 noncarious extracted human molars was exposed, finished with wet 600-grit silicon carbide paper, and a block of resin composite bonded with adhesives according to the manufacturers' instructions. The teeth were kept in tap water for 24 hours at 37 degrees C and sectioned to produce beams, with adhesive areas of +/- 0.9 mm2 (4 beams per tooth were obtained). The specimens were stressed at a crosshead speed of 1 mm per minute until the bonds ruptured.

RESULTS

The mean bond strengths were calculated as MPa and compared by performing analysis of variance and Tukey tests to identify significant differences between the materials (P = 0.05). The mean bond strength of Clearfil SE Bond was significantly higher than that of OptiBond Solo Plus and iBond (P <.05). OptiBond Solo Plus gave significantly higher bond strengths than iBond (P <.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The self-etching adhesive system Clearfil SE Bond (2 step) had higher bond strength than the 1-bottle self-etching adhesive iBond (single application) and the 2-step single-bottle system OptiBond Solo Plus (total etch). However, the 1-bottle adhesive system OptiBond Solo Plus (total etch system) had higher bond strength than the 1-bottle self-etching adhesive system iBond.

摘要

目的

目前,牙本质黏结的趋势似乎正从湿黏结系统转向自酸蚀系统,且从多个应用步骤转向单一步骤。然而,近期研究表明,单步黏结剂的性能低于两步自酸蚀或全酸蚀系统。在本研究中,对全酸蚀、两步自酸蚀和单步自酸蚀黏结剂的微拉伸黏结强度进行了比较评估。

方法与材料

暴露12颗非龋性拔除的人类磨牙的咬合面表层牙本质,用湿的600目碳化硅砂纸进行处理,然后根据制造商的说明用黏结剂粘结一块树脂复合材料。将牙齿在37℃的自来水中保存24小时,然后切片制成梁状,黏结面积为±0.9平方毫米(每颗牙齿获得4根梁)。以每分钟1毫米的十字头速度对标本施加应力,直至黏结破裂。

结果

以兆帕为单位计算平均黏结强度,并通过进行方差分析和Tukey检验进行比较,以确定材料之间的显著差异(P = 0.05)。Clearfil SE Bond的平均黏结强度显著高于OptiBond Solo Plus和iBond(P <.05)。OptiBond Solo Plus的黏结强度显著高于iBond(P <.05)。

结论

自酸蚀黏结系统Clearfil SE Bond(两步法)的黏结强度高于单瓶自酸蚀黏结剂iBond(单次应用)和两步单瓶系统OptiBond Solo Plus(全酸蚀)。然而,单瓶黏结剂系统OptiBond Solo Plus(全酸蚀系统)的黏结强度高于单瓶自酸蚀黏结剂系统iBond。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验