Constantinescu Radu, Richard Irene, Kurlan Roger
Department of Neurology, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York, USA.
Mov Disord. 2007 Nov 15;22(15):2141-8; quiz 2295. doi: 10.1002/mds.21578.
A literature review was conducted to investigate whether or not levodopa (LD) responsiveness (LR) is a useful criterion in the diagnosis of parkinsonian disorders. Although LR does appear to differ among the parkinsonian disorders, there is considerable confusion in the literature. While most patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) have a sustained benefit from LD, a small minority of patients with documented PD do not respond. The literature suggests that the LR rate is higher for multiple system atrophy (MSA), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and corticobasal degeneration (CBD) than based on published diagnostic criteria. Magnitude and duration of response to LD and tolerability (time course, type and distribution of dyskinesias, mental effects and motor worsening) may be useful features in distinguishing PD, MSA, PSP, and CBD. Efforts should be directed toward better defining LR when used for diagnostic purposes and in scientific publications.
进行了一项文献综述,以研究左旋多巴(LD)反应性(LR)是否是帕金森病诊断中的一个有用标准。尽管LR在帕金森病中似乎确实存在差异,但文献中存在相当大的混淆。虽然大多数帕金森病(PD)患者从LD中持续获益,但少数有记录的PD患者并无反应。文献表明,多系统萎缩(MSA)、进行性核上性麻痹(PSP)和皮质基底节变性(CBD)的LR率高于已发表的诊断标准。对LD的反应程度和持续时间以及耐受性(运动障碍的时间进程、类型和分布、精神影响和运动恶化)可能是区分PD、MSA、PSP和CBD的有用特征。在用于诊断目的和科学出版物时,应努力更好地定义LR。