Hall Spencer R, Leibold Mathew A, Lytle David A, Smith Val H
Department of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA.
Ecology. 2007 May;88(5):1142-52. doi: 10.1890/06-0923.
The stoichiometric light:nutrient hypothesis (LNH) links the relative supplies of key resources with the nutrient content of tissues of producers. This resource-driven variation in producer stoichiometry, in turn, can mediate the efficiency of grazing. Typically, discussions of the LNH attribute this resource-stoichiometry link to bottom-up effects of light and phosphorus, which are mediated through producer physiology. Emphasis on bottom-up effects implies that grazers must consume food of quality solely determined by resource supply to ecosystems (i.e., they eat what they are served). Here, we expand upon this largely bottom-up interpretation with evidence from pond surveys, a mesocosm experiment, and a model. Data from shallow ponds showed the "LNH pattern" (positive correlation of an index of light : phosphorus supply with algal carbon : phosphorus content). However, algal carbon : phosphorus content also declined as zooplankton biomass increased in the ponds. The experiment and model confirmed that this latter correlation was partially caused by the various bottom-up and top-down roles of grazers: the LNH pattern emerged only in treatments with crustacean grazers, not those without them. Furthermore, model and experiment clarified that another bottom-up factor, natural covariation of nitrogen : phosphorus ratios with light : phosphorus supply (as seen in ponds), does not likely contribute to the LNH pattern. Finally, the experiment produced correlations between shifts in species composition of algae, partially driven by grazing effects of crustaceans, and algal stoichiometry. These shifts in species composition might shape stoichiometric response of producer assemblages to resource supply and grazing, but their consequences remain largely unexplored. Thus, this study accentuated the importance of grazing for the LNH; de-emphasized a potentially confounding, bottom-up factor (covarying nitrogen : phosphorus supply); and highlighted an avenue for future research for the LNH (grazer-mediated shifts in producer composition).
养分假说(LNH)将关键资源的相对供应与生产者组织的养分含量联系起来。生产者化学计量的这种资源驱动变化反过来又可以调节放牧效率。通常,对LNH的讨论将这种资源 - 化学计量联系归因于光和磷的自下而上效应,这些效应是通过生产者生理介导的。对自下而上效应的强调意味着食草动物必须仅食用由生态系统资源供应完全决定质量的食物(即,它们吃提供给它们的食物)。在这里,我们通过池塘调查、中宇宙实验和一个模型的证据,对这种主要是自下而上的解释进行扩展。来自浅水池塘的数据显示了“LNH模式”(光:磷供应指数与藻类碳:磷含量呈正相关)。然而,随着池塘中浮游动物生物量的增加,藻类碳:磷含量也下降。实验和模型证实,后一种相关性部分是由食草动物的各种自下而上和自上而下作用引起的:LNH模式仅在有甲壳类食草动物的处理中出现,没有它们的处理中则没有。此外,模型和实验表明,另一个自下而上的因素,氮:磷比率与光:磷供应的自然协变(如在池塘中所见),不太可能导致LNH模式。最后,实验得出了藻类物种组成的变化之间的相关性,部分是由甲壳类动物的放牧效应驱动的,以及藻类化学计量。这些物种组成的变化可能会塑造生产者组合对资源供应和放牧的化学计量反应,但其后果在很大程度上仍未得到探索。因此,本研究强调了放牧对LNH的重要性;淡化了一个潜在的混淆性自下而上因素(协变的氮:磷供应);并突出了LNH未来研究的一个途径(食草动物介导的生产者组成变化)。