Strasser R H, Puig J G, Farsang C, Croket M, Li J, van Ingen H
Technical University Dresden, Heart Center, University Hospital, Dresden, Germany.
J Hum Hypertens. 2007 Oct;21(10):780-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1002220. Epub 2007 May 31.
Patients with severe hypertension (>180/110 mm Hg) require large blood pressure (BP) reductions to reach recommended treatment goals (<140/90 mm Hg) and usually require combination therapy to do so. This 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study compared the tolerability and antihypertensive efficacy of the novel direct renin inhibitor aliskiren with the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril in patients with severe hypertension (mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msDBP)>or=105 mm Hg and <120 mm Hg). In all, 183 patients were randomized (2:1) to aliskiren 150 mg (n=125) or lisinopril 20 mg (n=58) with dose titration (to aliskiren 300 mg or lisinopril 40 mg) and subsequent addition of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) if additional BP control was required. Aliskiren-based treatment (ALI) was similar to lisinopril-based treatment (LIS) with respect to the proportion of patients reporting an adverse event (AE; ALI 32.8%; LIS 29.3%) or discontinuing treatment due to AEs (ALI 3.2%; LIS 3.4%). The most frequently reported AEs in both groups were headache, nasopharyngitis and dizziness. At end point, ALI showed similar mean reductions from baseline to LIS in msDBP (ALI -18.5 mm Hg vs LIS -20.1 mm Hg; mean treatment difference 1.7 mm Hg (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.0, 4.4)) and mean sitting systolic blood pressure (ALI -20.0 mm Hg vs LIS -22.3 mm Hg; mean treatment difference 2.8 mm Hg (95% CI -1.7, 7.4)). Responder rates (msDBP<90 mm Hg and/or reduction from baseline>or=10 mm Hg) were 81.5% with ALI and 87.9% with LIS. Approximately half of patients required the addition of HCTZ to achieve BP control (ALI 53.6%; LIS 44.8%). In conclusion, ALI alone, or in combination with HCTZ, exhibits similar tolerability and antihypertensive efficacy to LIS alone, or in combination with HCTZ, in patients with severe hypertension.
重度高血压(>180/110 mmHg)患者需要大幅降低血压(BP)才能达到推荐治疗目标(<140/90 mmHg),通常需要联合治疗才能实现。这项为期8周的多中心、随机、双盲、平行组研究比较了新型直接肾素抑制剂阿利吉仑与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂赖诺普利在重度高血压(平均静息舒张压(msDBP)≥105 mmHg且<120 mmHg)患者中的耐受性和降压疗效。共有183例患者被随机分组(2:1),分别接受阿利吉仑150 mg(n = 125)或赖诺普利20 mg(n = 58)治疗,并进行剂量滴定(至阿利吉仑300 mg或赖诺普利40 mg),如果需要进一步控制血压,则随后加用氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)。基于阿利吉仑的治疗(ALI)与基于赖诺普利的治疗(LIS)在报告不良事件(AE;ALI 32.8%;LIS 29.3%)或因AE而停药(ALI 3.2%;LIS 3.4%)的患者比例方面相似。两组中最常报告的AE为头痛、鼻咽炎和头晕。在终点时,ALI在msDBP方面显示出与LIS相似的从基线的平均降低幅度(ALI -18.5 mmHg vs LIS -20.1 mmHg;平均治疗差异1.7 mmHg(95%置信区间(CI)-1.0,4.4))以及平均静息收缩压(ALI -20.0 mmHg vs LIS -22.3 mmHg;平均治疗差异2.8 mmHg(95% CI -1.7,7.4))。达标率(msDBP<90 mmHg和/或较基线降低≥10 mmHg)在ALI组为81.5%,在LIS组为87.9%。约一半的患者需要加用HCTZ以实现血压控制(ALI 53.6%;LIS 44.8%)。总之,在重度高血压患者中,单独使用ALI或与HCTZ联合使用,与单独使用LIS或与HCTZ联合使用相比,具有相似的耐受性和降压疗效。