Pressman Mark R, Mahowald Mark W, Schenck Carlos H, Bornemann Michel Cramer
Sleep Medicine Services, The Lankenau Hospital, Wynnewood, PA 19096, USA.
J Sleep Res. 2007 Jun;16(2):198-212. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2007.00586.x.
An increasing number of criminal cases have claimed the defendant to be in a state of sleepwalking or related disorders induced by high quantities of alcohol. Sleepwalkers who commit violent acts, sexual assaults and other criminal acts are thought to be in a state of automatism, lacking conscious awareness and criminal intent. They may be acquitted in criminal trials. On the other hand, criminal acts performed as the result of voluntary alcohol intoxication alone cannot be used as a complete defense. The alcohol-induced sleepwalking criminal defense is most often based on past clinical or legal reports that ingestion of alcohol directly 'triggers' sleepwalking or increased the risk of sleepwalking by increasing the quantity of slow wave sleep (SWS). A review of the sleep medicine literature found no sleep laboratory studies of the effects of alcohol on the sleep of clinically diagnosed sleepwalkers. However, 19 sleep laboratory studies of the effects of alcohol on the sleep of healthy non-drinkers or social drinkers were identified with none reporting a change in SWS as a percentage of total sleep time. However, in six of 19 studies, a modest but statistically significant increase in SWS was found in the first 2-4 h. Among studies of sleep in alcohol abusers and abstinent abusers, the quantity and percentage of SWS was most often reduced and sometimes absent. Claims that direct alcohol provocation tests can assist in the forensic assessment of these cases found no support of any kind in the medical literature with not a single report of testing in normative or patient groups and no reports of validation testing of any sort. There is no direct experimental evidence that alcohol predisposes or triggers sleepwalking or related disorders. A legal defense of sleepwalking resulting from voluntarily ingested alcohol should be consistent with the current state of art sleep science and meet generally accepted requirements for the diagnosis of sleepwalking and other parasomnias.
越来越多的刑事案件中,被告声称自己处于梦游状态或因大量饮酒引发的相关障碍。实施暴力行为、性侵及其他犯罪行为的梦游者被认为处于自动行为状态,缺乏意识和犯罪意图。他们在刑事审判中可能会被宣告无罪。另一方面,仅因自愿醉酒而实施的犯罪行为不能作为完全的抗辩理由。酒精诱发梦游的刑事辩护大多基于以往临床或法律报告,即摄入酒精直接“引发”梦游或通过增加慢波睡眠(SWS)量而增加梦游风险。对睡眠医学文献的回顾发现,没有针对酒精对临床诊断梦游者睡眠影响的睡眠实验室研究。然而,确定了19项关于酒精对健康非饮酒者或社交饮酒者睡眠影响的睡眠实验室研究,没有一项报告SWS占总睡眠时间的比例有变化。然而,在19项研究中的6项里,在前2至4小时发现SWS有适度但具有统计学意义的增加。在对酗酒者和戒酒者的睡眠研究中,SWS的量和比例大多降低,有时甚至没有。声称直接酒精激发试验有助于对这些案件进行法医评估的说法,在医学文献中未得到任何支持,没有关于在正常人群或患者群体中进行测试的单一报告,也没有任何类型的验证测试报告。没有直接实验证据表明酒精会诱发或引发梦游或相关障碍。因自愿摄入酒精导致梦游的法律辩护应与当前睡眠科学的技术水平一致,并符合梦游和其他异态睡眠诊断的普遍接受要求。