Spek Viola, Nyklícek Ivan, Cuijpers Pim, Pop Victor
Department of Psychology and Health, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
J Affect Disord. 2008 Jan;105(1-3):137-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.05.001. Epub 2007 May 31.
Little is known about which participant characteristics determine the effectiveness of various types of cognitive behavior therapy for sub-threshold depression. The aim of this study was to investigate which characteristics predict treatment outcome of group and internet-based interventions for sub-threshold depression, with a special focus on (i) the five main personality factors, and (ii) their different predictive power in the different types of treatment.
Eighty-five women and 45 men (mean age=55 years, S.D.=4.4) were randomly assigned to a group treatment and an internet-based treatment. The outcome measure was the difference between pre-treatment and post-treatment BDI scores. Analyses of Covariance were conducted to examine which participant characteristics could predict outcome for the two different types of treatment.
Higher baseline BDI scores (F(1,111)=52.88, p<.01), female gender (F(1,111)=6.45, p=.01), and lower neuroticism scores (F(1,111)=7.24, p=.01) predicted better outcome after both treatments. In the group intervention, participants with higher altruism scores improved significantly more after treatment (F(1,111)=3.94, p=.05) compared to the internet-based condition.
Axis-II disorders were not considered; the study assessed personality traits rather than personality disorders.
Outcomes of different types of cognitive behavior therapy for sub-threshold depression are partly predicted by different participant characteristics. Neuroticism was associated with worse outcomes in both types of treatment, while altruism seems to be exclusively related to more favorable outcomes in the group treatment.
关于哪些参与者特征决定了各种类型的认知行为疗法对阈下抑郁症的有效性,人们所知甚少。本研究的目的是调查哪些特征可预测针对阈下抑郁症的团体干预和基于互联网干预的治疗结果,特别关注(i)五个主要人格因素,以及(ii)它们在不同类型治疗中的不同预测能力。
85名女性和45名男性(平均年龄 = 55岁,标准差 = 4.4)被随机分配到团体治疗组和基于互联网的治疗组。结果指标是治疗前和治疗后贝克抑郁量表(BDI)得分的差异。进行协方差分析以检查哪些参与者特征可以预测两种不同类型治疗的结果。
较高的基线BDI得分(F(1,111)=52.88,p<.01)、女性性别(F(1,111)=6.45,p=.01)和较低的神经质得分(F(1,111)=7.24,p=.01)预测两种治疗后的结果更好。在团体干预中,与基于互联网的治疗相比,利他主义得分较高的参与者治疗后改善更为显著(F(1,111)=3.94,p=.05)。
未考虑轴II障碍;该研究评估的是人格特质而非人格障碍。
针对阈下抑郁症的不同类型认知行为疗法的结果部分由不同的参与者特征预测。神经质与两种治疗的较差结果相关,而利他主义似乎仅与团体治疗中更有利的结果相关。