Suppr超能文献

[肾功能评估方法的比较(考纳斯医科大学医院2006年数据)]

[Comparison of methods for evaluating renal function (Data of Kaunas University of Medicine Hospital in 2006)].

作者信息

Kuzminskis Vytautas, Skarupskiene Inga, Bumblyte Inga Arūne, Kardauskaite Zydrūne, Uogintaite Jurgita

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Kaunas University of Medicine, Kaunas, Lithuania.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2007;43 Suppl 1:46-51.

Abstract

Cockcroft-Gault formula and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation are widely used as indirect estimates of renal function. The precision and reliability of these formulas regarding kidney function are still discussed. The aim of our study was to evaluate glomerular filtration rate by different methods and compare the results. Data on patients in whom renal function was evaluated at the Clinic of Nephrology of Kaunas University of Medicine Hospital in 2006 are presented in this article. Glomerular filtration rate was assessed based on 24-hour endogenous creatinine clearance and calculated using three formulas: Cockcroft-Gault, abbreviated MDRD, and complete MDRD. Blood serum creatinine level was measured by the standardized Jaffe assay. Glomerular filtration rate was examined in 125 patients. Their mean age was 58.07+/-18.962 years. The mean endogenous creatinine clearance was 31.1287+/-31.14 783 mL/min. The mean glomerular filtration rate calculated by Cockcroft-Gault formula was 34.1220+/-29.02 967 mL/min, by abbreviated MDRD formula was 29.8212+/-25.83 866 mL/min/1.73 m2, and by complete MDRD formula was 28.6884+/-24.99 353 mL/min/1.73 m2. There was no statistically significant difference in mean glomerular filtration rates estimated using all methods in the evaluation of kidney function. When the reliability of formulas was analyzed depending on each stage of chronic kidney disease, it was found that Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD formulas, in contrast to endogenous creatinine clearance, did not precisely reflect kidney function in stages 1 and 2 of chronic kidney disease. Estimates by Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD formulas correctly showed decreased kidney function in stages 3 and 4 of chronic kidney disease. Formulas were not reliable, in contrast to endogenous creatinine clearance, when patients were in end-stage chronic kidney disease. CONCLUSIONS. Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD formulas are best for the evaluation of moderate degree of renal insufficiency, and in early stage of chronic kidney disease, underestimation of glomerular filtration rate is possible by using formulas. Estimates of glomerular filtration rate based on formulas are higher as compared to endogenous creatinine clearance measurements in end-stage chronic kidney disease.

摘要

Cockcroft-Gault公式和肾脏病饮食改良(MDRD)方程被广泛用作肾功能的间接估计方法。这些公式在评估肾功能方面的准确性和可靠性仍存在争议。我们研究的目的是通过不同方法评估肾小球滤过率并比较结果。本文展示了2006年在考纳斯医科大学医院肾病科接受肾功能评估的患者的数据。基于24小时内生肌酐清除率评估肾小球滤过率,并使用三个公式进行计算:Cockcroft-Gault公式、简化MDRD公式和完整MDRD公式。血清肌酐水平通过标准化的Jaffe法测量。对125例患者的肾小球滤过率进行了检测。他们的平均年龄为58.07±18.962岁。平均内生肌酐清除率为31.1287±31.14783 mL/min。通过Cockcroft-Gault公式计算的平均肾小球滤过率为34.1220±29.02967 mL/min,通过简化MDRD公式计算的为29.8212±25.83866 mL/min/1.73 m²,通过完整MDRD公式计算的为28.6884±24.99353 mL/min/1.73 m²。在评估肾功能时,使用所有方法估计的平均肾小球滤过率没有统计学上的显著差异。当根据慢性肾脏病的各个阶段分析公式可靠性时,发现与内生肌酐清除率相比,Cockcroft-Gault公式和MDRD公式在慢性肾脏病1期和2期不能准确反映肾功能。Cockcroft-Gault公式和MDRD公式正确显示了慢性肾脏病3期和4期肾功能的下降。与内生肌酐清除率相比,当患者处于终末期慢性肾脏病时,公式不可靠。结论。Cockcroft-Gault公式和MDRD公式最适合评估中度肾功能不全,在慢性肾脏病早期,使用公式可能会低估肾小球滤过率。在终末期慢性肾脏病中,基于公式的肾小球滤过率估计值高于内生肌酐清除率测量值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验