Tremblay C, Picard M, Barbarosie T, Banville R
Université de Montréal, Qué., Canada.
Audiology. 1991;30(4):212-40.
The goal of this study was to determine the extent to which the difficulty frequently experienced by hearing-impaired listeners in understanding noisy speech can be clinically described in terms of the auditory site of lesion. To this end, shifts of speech reception threshold in noise, using standardized franco-québécois bisyllabic word lists, were obtained from noise-exposed workers and compared to Plomp's model to ascertain content validity. Shifts resulted from monaural listening to a broad-band speech spectrum noise held constant at 0 dB signal-to-noise ratio. In this manner, increasing the presentation levels of both speech and noise was expected to progressively minimize the contribution of Plomp's class A attenuation component to speech hearing loss and eventually show an unequivocal manifestation of its distortion component (class D speech hearing loss). Listeners were 457 noise-exposed workers giving a total of 914 observations. Rejection of those ears with suspected middle-ear pathology led to a reduction to a total of 709 observations representing various degrees of permanent hearing impairment. An additional 98 observations showed normal hearing sensitivity in spite of noise exposure averaging 9.6 years. Results indicated the presence of five categories of speech threshold shifts varying independently of hearing sensitivity. 59.8% of those observations with permanent hearing impairment (424/709) simultaneously showed a problem understanding speech in noise. On 78 occasions, listening in noise was so disturbed that the 50% performance level corresponding to the speech threshold could no longer be established within reasonable limits, that is up to 65 dB above the speech threshold in a quiet environment. Conversely, 26.5% of the observations with essentially normal hearing sensitivity (26/98) showed reduced speech reception in noise. Fitting Plomp's model confirmed our expectations for two of the five categories of scores. A principal component analysis identified similar behaviour of speech threshold shifts in noise compared with Plomp's class D speech hearing loss. Hence, these speech threshold shifts in noise were interpreted as predominantly reflecting peripheral auditory disorders, that is defective frequency selectivity and temporal resolution. The remaining categories were found to be under the predominant influence of two other mechanisms: (1) band width reduction resulting from impaired hearing; (2) disorders associated with certain non-auditory cognitive factors, namely selective attention and the ability to make use of the redundancy of the message.
本研究的目的是确定听力受损者在理解嘈杂言语时经常遇到的困难在多大程度上可以根据听觉病变部位进行临床描述。为此,使用标准化的法裔魁北克双音节词表,从噪声暴露工人中获得噪声中言语接受阈值的变化,并与普洛姆模型进行比较以确定内容效度。变化是通过单耳聆听宽带言语频谱噪声产生的,该噪声的信噪比保持在0 dB不变。通过这种方式,预计增加言语和噪声的呈现水平将逐渐最小化普洛姆A类衰减成分对言语听力损失的贡献,并最终显示其失真成分(D类言语听力损失)的明确表现。受试者为457名噪声暴露工人,共进行了914次观察。排除那些怀疑有中耳病变的耳朵后,观察次数减少到总共709次,代表了不同程度的永久性听力损伤。另外98次观察显示,尽管平均噪声暴露时间为9.6年,但听力敏感性正常。结果表明存在五类独立于听力敏感性变化的言语阈值变化。59.8%的永久性听力损伤观察结果(424/709)同时显示出在噪声中理解言语存在问题。有78次,在噪声中聆听受到严重干扰,以至于在合理范围内(即在安静环境中高于言语阈值65 dB以内)无法再确定对应于言语阈值的50%表现水平。相反,26.5%听力敏感性基本正常的观察结果(26/98)显示在噪声中言语接受能力下降。拟合普洛姆模型证实了我们对五类分数中两类的预期。主成分分析确定了噪声中言语阈值变化与普洛姆D类言语听力损失具有相似的行为。因此,这些噪声中言语阈值变化主要被解释为反映外周听觉障碍,即频率选择性和时间分辨率缺陷。其余类别被发现主要受其他两种机制的影响:(1)听力受损导致的带宽降低;(2)与某些非听觉认知因素相关的障碍,即选择性注意力和利用信息冗余的能力。