Wong Cheuk-Man, Hong Minna, Earhart Gammon M
Washington University School of Medicine, Program in Physical Therapy, St Louis, MO 63108, USA.
Somatosens Mot Res. 2007 Mar-Jun;24(1-2):35-40. doi: 10.1080/08990220601183741.
Following stepping in place on a rotating treadmill, subjects inadvertently rotate when asked to step in place without vision. This response is called podokinetic after-rotation (PKAR). The purpose of this study was to determine whether PKAR transfers across tasks with different lower limb configurations, that is, from kneeling to stepping. We hypothesized that PKAR would transfer from kneeling to stepping for two reasons. First, there have been several demonstrations of robust PKAR transfer from forward to backward walking, stepping to hopping, running to walking, and from one limb to another. Second, we thought that afferent information regarding hip rotation was likely a key source of information to guide podokinetic adaptation and since hip rotation would be preserved in both stimulation conditions we expected to see little difference between the conditions. We compared the PKAR responses recorded in standing from 13 healthy young volunteers after either standard stepping on a rotating treadmill or stepping while kneeling (kneel-stepping) on a rotating treadmill. Subjects performed two sessions of podokinetic (PK) stimulation, one stepping and one kneel-stepping on a rotating treadmill. Following the PK stimulation, subjects were blindfolded and asked to step in place in standing. Angular velocity of trunk rotation during PKAR from the two sessions was calculated and compared. The maximum angular velocities of PKAR recorded in stepping were significantly higher following the stepping session than following the kneel-stepping session (9.10 +/- 8.9 and 2.94 +/- 1.6 deg/s, respectively). This was despite the fact that hip rotation excursion during PK stimulation was significantly greater in kneel-stepping (18.7 +/- 3.6 deg) than in stepping (12.2 +/- 2.6 deg). These results indicate very little transfer from kneeling to stepping and suggest that afferent information regarding hip rotation is not the only or even the major source of limb position sense information used to drive locomotor trajectory adaptation.
在旋转跑步机上原地踏步后,当要求受试者在没有视觉的情况下原地踏步时,他们会不自觉地旋转。这种反应被称为足动后旋转(PKAR)。本研究的目的是确定PKAR是否能在具有不同下肢配置的任务之间转移,即从跪姿到踏步。我们假设PKAR会从跪姿转移到踏步有两个原因。首先,已经有几个例子表明PKAR能从向前行走强劲地转移到向后行走、从踏步到跳跃、从跑步到行走以及从一个肢体转移到另一个肢体。其次,我们认为关于髋关节旋转的传入信息可能是指导足动适应的关键信息来源,并且由于在两种刺激条件下髋关节旋转都会保留,我们预计两种条件之间差异不大。我们比较了13名健康年轻志愿者在旋转跑步机上进行标准踏步或跪姿踏步(跪步)后站立时记录的PKAR反应。受试者进行了两阶段的足动(PK)刺激,一次是在旋转跑步机上踏步,一次是在旋转跑步机上跪步。PK刺激后,受试者被蒙上眼睛并被要求在站立时原地踏步。计算并比较了两个阶段PKAR期间躯干旋转的角速度。在踏步阶段后记录的PKAR最大角速度显著高于跪步阶段后记录的(分别为9.10±8.9和2.94±1.6度/秒)。尽管在PK刺激期间,跪步时髋关节旋转幅度(18.7±3.6度)明显大于踏步时(12.2±2.6度)。这些结果表明从跪姿到踏步的转移非常少,并表明关于髋关节旋转的传入信息不是用于驱动运动轨迹适应的唯一甚至主要的肢体位置感觉信息来源。