Mackie Alan R, Ridout Michael J, Moates Graham, Husband Fiona A, Wilde Peter J
Structuring Food for Health Programme, Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Colney, Norwich NR4 7UA, United Kingdom.
J Agric Food Chem. 2007 Jul 11;55(14):5611-9. doi: 10.1021/jf0636925. Epub 2007 Jun 9.
We have quantified observed differences in the microstructure and rheology of creaming emulsions stabilized by protein and low molecular weight surfactants. In this study, we made two sets of emulsions from a single parent emulsion, which differed only in their interfacial composition (i.e., either protein or surfactant). The protein studied was whey protein isolate. The zeta potential of the surfactant-stabilized emulsion was controlled by mixing anionic (SDS) and nonionic (Brij 35) surfactants to match the zeta potential of the protein-stabilized emulsion. Despite this, ultrasonic creaming measurements and confocal microscopy showed that the structures within the cream layers were different between the two sets of emulsions. The protein-stabilized emulsions appeared to slow or arrest the packing within the cream, leading to a lower density network of emulsion droplets, whereas the surfactant emulsion droplets rearranged more quickly into a well-packed, concentrated cream layer. Rheological analysis of the creams showed that despite the protein-stabilized emulsions having a lower dispersed phase volume fraction, their elastic modulus was approximately 30 times greater than that of a comparable surfactant-stabilized emulsion. These differences were caused by the ability of the protein to form a highly viscoelastic interfacial network around the droplets which may include intermolecular covalent cross-links. At close range the adhesive nature of the interaction between the layers contributes to the microstructure and rheology of concentrated emulsions. This is the first time that such well-defined emulsion systems have been studied in detail both noninvasively to look at the impact on creaming and also invasively to look at the impact on bulk rheological properties.
我们已经对由蛋白质和低分子量表面活性剂稳定的乳状液在微观结构和流变学方面观察到的差异进行了量化。在本研究中,我们从单一母乳液制备了两组乳状液,它们仅在界面组成上有所不同(即要么是蛋白质,要么是表面活性剂)。所研究的蛋白质是乳清分离蛋白。通过混合阴离子(SDS)和非离子(Brij 35)表面活性剂来控制表面活性剂稳定的乳状液的ζ电位,以使其与蛋白质稳定的乳状液的ζ电位相匹配。尽管如此,超声乳析测量和共聚焦显微镜显示,两组乳状液的乳析层内结构不同。蛋白质稳定的乳状液似乎减缓或阻止了乳析层内的堆积,导致乳液滴形成密度较低的网络,而表面活性剂乳液滴则更快地重新排列成紧密堆积、浓缩的乳析层。对乳析层的流变学分析表明,尽管蛋白质稳定的乳状液的分散相体积分数较低,但其弹性模量大约是可比的表面活性剂稳定的乳状液的30倍。这些差异是由蛋白质在液滴周围形成高度粘弹性界面网络的能力引起的,该网络可能包括分子间共价交联。在近距离范围内,层间相互作用的粘附性质有助于浓缩乳状液的微观结构和流变学。这是首次对如此明确的乳液体系进行详细研究,既采用非侵入性方法来观察对乳析的影响,也采用侵入性方法来观察对整体流变学性质的影响。