Craddock Helen L, Youngson Callum C, Manogue Michael, Blance Andrew
Restorative Dentistry, Leeds Dental Institute, Leeds, UK.
J Prosthodont. 2007 Nov-Dec;16(6):485-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00212.x. Epub 2007 Jun 9.
One of the barriers to restoring an edentulous space may be the supraeruption of an unopposed tooth to occupy some or all of the space needed for prosthetic replacement. The aim of this study was to determine the extent and type of supraeruption associated with unopposed posterior teeth and to investigate the relationship between these and oral and patient factors.
Diagnostic casts of 100 patients with an unopposed posterior tooth and of 100 control patients were scanned and analyzed to record the extent of supraeruption, together with other clinical parameters. The type of eruption present was defined for each subject as Periodontal Growth, Active Eruption, or Relative Wear. Generalized Linear Models were developed to examine associations between the extent and type of supraeruption and patient or dental factors. The extent of supraeruption for an individual was modeled to show association between the degree of supraeruption and clinical parameters. Three models were produced to show associations between each type of supraeruption and clinical parameters.
The mean supraeruption for subjects was 1.68 mm (SD 0.79, range 0 to 3.99 mm) and for controls, 0.24 mm (SD 0.39, range 0 to 1.46 mm). The extent of supraeruption was statistically greater in maxillary unopposed teeth than in mandibular unopposed teeth. Supraeruption was found in 92% of subjects' unopposed teeth.
A Generalized Linear Model could be produced to demonstrate that the clinical parameters associated with supraeruption are periodontal growth, attachment loss, and the lingual movement of the tooth distal to the extraction site. Three types of supraeruption, which may be present singly, or in combination, can be identified. Active eruption has an association with attachment loss. Periodontal growth has an inverse association with attachment loss, is more prevalent in younger patients, in the maxilla, in premolars, and in females. Relative wear has an association with increasing age and is more prevalent in unopposed mandibular teeth.
修复无牙间隙的障碍之一可能是未对合牙的过度萌出,占据了义齿修复所需的部分或全部间隙。本研究的目的是确定与未对合后牙相关的过度萌出的程度和类型,并研究这些与口腔及患者因素之间的关系。
对100例有未对合后牙的患者及100例对照患者的诊断模型进行扫描和分析,记录过度萌出的程度以及其他临床参数。为每个受试者确定的萌出类型为牙周生长型、主动萌出型或相对磨耗型。建立广义线性模型以检验过度萌出的程度和类型与患者或牙齿因素之间的关联。对个体的过度萌出程度进行建模,以显示过度萌出程度与临床参数之间的关联。生成三个模型以显示每种过度萌出类型与临床参数之间的关联。
受试者的平均过度萌出为1.68mm(标准差0.79,范围0至3.99mm),对照者为0.24mm(标准差0.39,范围0至1.46mm)。上颌未对合牙的过度萌出程度在统计学上高于下颌未对合牙。在92%受试者的未对合牙中发现了过度萌出。
可以生成一个广义线性模型来证明与过度萌出相关的临床参数是牙周生长、附着丧失以及拔牙部位远中牙齿的舌向移动。可以识别出三种可能单独出现或合并出现的过度萌出类型。主动萌出与附着丧失有关。牙周生长与附着丧失呈负相关,在年轻患者、上颌、前磨牙和女性中更常见。相对磨耗与年龄增长有关,在未对合的下颌牙中更常见。