Jenkins Ian A, Playfor Stephen D, Bevan Cliff, Davies Gerald, Wolf Andrew R
Paediatric Intensive Care Society Study Group, UK.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 Jul;17(7):675-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02180.x.
The aim of this study was to investigate the current practice of sedation, analgesia, and neuromuscular blockade in critically ill children on pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in the UK and identify areas that merit further study.
Data were gathered in a prospective observational study of 338 critically ill children in 20 UK PICUs.
There is considerable variation in clinical practice. A total of 24 different sedative and analgesic agents were used during the study. The most commonly used sedative and analgesic agents were midazolam and morphine. Four different neuromuscular blockers (NMBs) were used, most commonly vecuronium. There were differences in treatment between cardiac and noncardiac children, but there were a greater number of infants and neonates in the cardiac group. NMBs were used in 30% of mechanically ventilated patients. Withdrawal symptoms were reported in 13% of ventilated patients, relatively early in their stay; weaning sedative agents ('tapering') was apparently of no benefit. The use of clonidine in this setting was noted. Physical restraints were used in 7.4%. Propofol was used but in only 2.6% of patients, all over the age of 4 years, and not exceeding 2 mgxkg(-1)xh(-1). No side effects attributable to 'propofol syndrome' were noted.
There is considerable heterogeneity of sedation techniques. NMBs are used in a large portion of this population. Withdrawal symptoms were associated with higher doses of sedation and greater lengths of stay and were not ameliorated by withdrawing sedation gradually ('tapering').
本研究旨在调查英国儿科重症监护病房(PICUs)中危重症儿童镇静、镇痛和神经肌肉阻滞的当前实践情况,并确定值得进一步研究的领域。
在一项对英国20个PICUs的338名危重症儿童进行的前瞻性观察研究中收集数据。
临床实践存在很大差异。研究期间共使用了24种不同的镇静和镇痛药物。最常用的镇静和镇痛药物是咪达唑仑和吗啡。使用了4种不同的神经肌肉阻滞剂(NMBs),最常用的是维库溴铵。心脏疾病患儿和非心脏疾病患儿的治疗存在差异,但心脏疾病组中的婴儿和新生儿数量更多。30%的机械通气患者使用了NMBs。13%的通气患者报告出现戒断症状,且相对在住院早期出现;逐渐减少镇静药物用量(“逐渐减量”)显然没有益处。注意到在此情况下使用了可乐定。7.4%的患者使用了身体约束。使用了丙泊酚,但仅在4岁以上的患者中使用,且用量不超过2mg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹,未观察到与“丙泊酚综合征”相关的副作用。
镇静技术存在相当大的异质性。该人群中很大一部分使用了NMBs。戒断症状与较高剂量的镇静和较长的住院时间相关,且逐渐减少镇静药物用量(“逐渐减量”)并不能改善症状。