Tanimoto Tadao, Yamamoto Shigeto, Taniai Madoka, Taniguchi Mutsuko, Ariyasu Harumi, Ushio Chie, Aga Miho, Mukai Yohei, Tsutsumi Yasuo, Ariyasu Toshio, Ohta Tsunetaka, Fukuda Shigeharu
Biomedical Institute, Research Center, Hayashibara Biochemical Laboratories, Inc., Okayama 702-8006, Japan.
J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2007 Jun;27(6):517-23. doi: 10.1089/jir.2007.0155.
Although there are at least 13 interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) subtypes in humans, interactions between the subtypes remain unknown. To understand IFN-alpha interactions, we examined the antiproliferative activities and the receptor binding affinities of different combinations of IFN-alpha2 and IFN-alpha8 using six renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cell lines. Although IFN-alpha8 was the more potent subtype, synergistic and antagonistic antiproliferative effects were also observed in certain combinations of IFN-alpha2 and IFN-alpha8. To analyze the interactions between IFN-alpha2 and IFN-alpha8, the receptor-binding kinetics of different combinations of IFN-alpha2 and IFN- alpha8 to the IFN-alpha receptors, IFNAR-1 or IFNAR-2, were measured using a surface plasmon resonance-based biosensor. Unexpectedly, the receptor binding kinetics to IFNAR-2 but not to IFNAR-1 were mutually related to antiproliferative activity and increase in the binding speed (K(a)) for IFNAR-2. Moreover, we observed the increased fluorescence intensity (FI) of biotin-labeled IFN-alpha8 to IFNAR-2 by receptor binding inhibition assay with unlabeled IFN-alpha2 but not the other combinations. These findings indicate that the binding manner of IFN-alpha8 for IFNAR-2 is different from that of IFN-alpha2, suggesting that binding of IFN-alpha8 rather than binding of IFN-alpha2 to IFNAR-2 leads to activation and subsequent antiproliferative activity despite the same antiviral activity in RCC.
虽然人类中至少有13种α干扰素(IFN-α)亚型,但各亚型之间的相互作用尚不清楚。为了解IFN-α的相互作用,我们使用6种肾细胞癌(RCC)细胞系,检测了IFN-α2和IFN-α8不同组合的抗增殖活性及受体结合亲和力。尽管IFN-α8是更具活性的亚型,但在IFN-α2和IFN-α8的某些组合中也观察到了协同和拮抗的抗增殖作用。为分析IFN-α2和IFN-α8之间的相互作用,我们使用基于表面等离子体共振的生物传感器,检测了IFN-α2和IFN-α8不同组合与IFN-α受体IFNAR-1或IFNAR-2的受体结合动力学。出乎意料的是,与IFNAR-2而非IFNAR-1的受体结合动力学与抗增殖活性相互关联,并且IFNAR-2的结合速度(K(a))增加。此外,通过用未标记的IFN-α2而非其他组合进行受体结合抑制试验,我们观察到生物素标记的IFN-α8与IFNAR-2的荧光强度(FI)增加。这些发现表明,IFN-α8与IFNAR-2的结合方式不同于IFN-α2,这表明尽管在RCC中具有相同的抗病毒活性,但IFN-α8而非IFN-α2与IFNAR-2的结合导致激活及随后的抗增殖活性。