Suppr超能文献

影响头颈重建显微外科手术的经济因素:外科医生和医院的视角

Economic factors affecting head and neck reconstructive microsurgery: the surgeons' and hospital's perspective.

作者信息

Deleyiannis Frederic W-B, Porter Andrew C

机构信息

Pittsburgh and Philadelphia, Pa. From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Departments of Surgery and Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh; and Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jul;120(1):157-165. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000263535.82260.f1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the relative financial value of providing the service of free-tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction from the surgeons' and hospital's perspective.

METHODS

Medical and hospital accounting records of 58 consecutive patients undergoing head and neck resections and simultaneous free-flap reconstruction were reviewed. Software from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services was used to calculate anticipated Medicare payments to the surgeon based on current procedural terminology codes and to the hospital based on diagnosis-related group codes.

RESULTS

The mean actual payment to the surgeon for a free flap was $2300.60. This payment was 91.6 percent ($2300 out of $2510) of the calculated payment if all payments had been reimbursed by Medicare. Total charges and total payment to the hospital for the 58 patients were $19,148,852 and $2,765,552, respectively. After covering direct costs, total hospital revenue (i.e., margin) was $1,056,886. The mostly commonly assigned diagnosis-related group code was 482 (n = 35). According to the fee schedule for that code, if Medicare had been the insurance plan for these 35 patients, the mean payment to the hospital would have been $45,840. The actual mean hospital payment was $44,133. This actual hospital payment represents 96 percent of the calculated Medicare hospital payment ($44,133 of $45,840).

CONCLUSIONS

Free-flap reconstruction of the head and neck generates substantial revenue for the hospital. For their mutual benefit, hospitals should join with physicians in contract negotiations of physician reimbursement with insurance companies. Bolstered reimbursement figures would better attract and retain skilled surgeons dedicated to microvascular reconstruction.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是从外科医生和医院的角度确定提供头颈部重建的游离组织移植服务的相对经济价值。

方法

回顾了58例连续接受头颈部切除并同期游离皮瓣重建患者的医疗和医院会计记录。使用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的软件,根据当前程序术语代码计算预期支付给外科医生的医疗保险费用,并根据诊断相关分组代码计算支付给医院的费用。

结果

游离皮瓣手术支付给外科医生的平均实际费用为2300.60美元。如果所有费用均由医疗保险报销,这笔费用是计算费用的91.6%(2510美元中的2300美元)。58例患者的医院总收费和总支付分别为19148852美元和2765552美元。扣除直接成本后,医院总收入(即利润)为1056886美元。最常分配的诊断相关分组代码是482(n = 35)。根据该代码的收费表,如果医疗保险是这35例患者的保险计划,医院的平均支付将为45840美元。医院的实际平均支付为44133美元。这笔实际医院支付占计算的医疗保险医院支付的96%(45840美元中的44133美元)。

结论

头颈部游离皮瓣重建为医院带来可观的收入。为了双方的利益,医院应与医生共同参与与保险公司进行医生报销的合同谈判。提高报销金额将更好地吸引和留住致力于微血管重建的熟练外科医生。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验