Cairney John, Veldhuizen Scott, Kurdyak Paul, Missiuna Cheryl, Faught Brent E, Hay John
Health Systems Research and Consulting Unit, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Arch Dis Child. 2007 Nov;92(11):987-91. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.115097. Epub 2007 Jun 15.
In this study, we assess the potential of three subscales of the Children's Self-Perceptions of Adequacy in and Predilection for Physical Activity (CSAPPA), a measure of generalised self-efficacy, as possible screens for developmental coordination disorder (DCD).
We used the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency short form (BOTMP-SF) to identify probable cases of DCD. We administered the BOTMP-SF and the CSAPPA to 590 children in grades 4-8 from four schools in the Niagara region of Ontario, Canada. We used receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis to assess and compare the performance of the subscales and the full instrument.
The area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUC), a measure of the overall performance of the test against a diagnostic standard, was good for the full CSAPPA (AUC = 0.81, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.87). The adequacy (AUC = 0.79, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.85) and predilection (AUC = 0.80, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.87) subscales had performance statistically equivalent to the full scale. Since the adequacy subscale is shorter and has good content validity with respect to DCD, we ran additional analyses on this measure. A cut-point of 24 on this subscale gives a sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.97) and a specificity of 0.47 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.51).
The adequacy subscale of the CSAPPA appears to be equivalent to the full measure for the purposes of screening for DCD. Further research should explore the possibility of adding further criteria to improve the CSAPPA's modest specificity in this role.
在本研究中,我们评估了儿童身体活动充足感与偏好自我认知量表(CSAPPA)的三个分量表作为发育性协调障碍(DCD)潜在筛查工具的可能性,该量表用于衡量一般自我效能感。
我们使用布吕宁克-奥塞茨基运动技能测试简表(BOTMP-SF)来确定可能患有DCD的病例。我们对来自加拿大安大略省尼亚加拉地区四所学校的590名4至8年级儿童进行了BOTMP-SF和CSAPPA测试。我们使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析来评估和比较分量表及完整量表的表现。
接受性操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)是衡量测试相对于诊断标准的整体表现的指标,完整的CSAPPA表现良好(AUC = 0.81,95%可信区间0.75至0.87)。充足感分量表(AUC = 0.79,95%可信区间0.73至0.85)和偏好分量表(AUC = 0.80,95%可信区间0.74至0.87)的表现与完整量表在统计学上相当。由于充足感分量表较短且在DCD方面具有良好的内容效度,我们对该量表进行了额外分析。该分量表的切点为24时,敏感性为0.86(95%可信区间0.76至0.97),特异性为0.47(95%可信区间0.43至0.51)。
就筛查DCD而言,CSAPPA的充足感分量表似乎与完整量表相当。进一步的研究应探索增加更多标准以提高CSAPPA在该角色中适度特异性的可能性。