Suppr超能文献

脐带绕颈对胎儿颈部透明带厚度测量的影响。

Impact of nuchal cord on measurement of fetal nuchal translucency thickness.

作者信息

Scheier M, Egle D, Himmel I, Ramoni A, Viertl S, Huter O, Marth C

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;30(2):197-200. doi: 10.1002/uog.4064.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To define the impact of nuchal cord on the measurement of fetal nuchal translucency thickness (NT).

METHODS

Between December 2004 and June 2006, we examined prospectively 53 fetuses that were observed on routine first-trimester ultrasound examination between 11 + 3 and 13 + 6 weeks of gestation to have nuchal cord causing an indentation in the skin in the nuchal region. The fetuses were re-examined after a median interval of 132 min, when the cord was no longer around the neck and indentation of the skin had resolved. Various NT measurements (highest, lowest, mean) with the cord located around the neck (nuchal cord) were compared with NT measurements in the absence of nuchal cord ('true' NT) in the same fetuses. Measurements were considered to be equal when they were within mean +/- 1.96 SD, defined by our own intraobserver repeatability according to the method of Bland and Altman.

RESULTS

The mean of the largest and the smallest of six measurements in the presence of nuchal cord fell within the mean +/- 1.96 SD of our own intraobserver repeatability, i.e. gave a correct estimate of the true NT, in 80% of fetuses, while the NT was overestimated in 10% and underestimated in 10% of fetuses. The largest and the smallest of six measurements in the presence of nuchal cord gave an underestimate of the true NT in 2% of fetuses and an overestimate in 4% of fetuses, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There is a wide scattering of measurements in fetuses with nuchal cord in comparison to the same fetuses in the absence of nuchal cord. This prevents accurate prediction of the true NT, although the largest and smallest of repeat measurements with nuchal cord can allow calculation of the highest and lowest possible risks, respectively. These facts must be taken into consideration in counseling patients.

摘要

目的

确定脐带绕颈对胎儿颈部透明带厚度(NT)测量的影响。

方法

在2004年12月至2006年6月期间,我们前瞻性地检查了53例胎儿,这些胎儿在妊娠11 + 3至13 + 6周的常规孕早期超声检查中被观察到有脐带绕颈,导致颈部皮肤出现压痕。在中位数间隔132分钟后对胎儿进行重新检查,此时脐带不再绕颈且皮肤压痕已消失。将脐带绕颈(有脐带绕颈)时的各种NT测量值(最高值、最低值、平均值)与同一胎儿无脐带绕颈时的NT测量值(“真实”NT)进行比较。当测量值在根据Bland和Altman方法由我们自己的观察者内重复性定义的平均值±1.96标准差范围内时,认为测量值相等。

结果

在有脐带绕颈的情况下,六次测量中最大和最小测量值的平均值在我们自己的观察者内重复性平均值±1.96标准差范围内,即在80%的胎儿中对真实NT给出了正确估计,而在10%的胎儿中NT被高估,在10%的胎儿中NT被低估。在有脐带绕颈的情况下,六次测量中最大和最小测量值分别在2%的胎儿中低估了真实NT,在4%的胎儿中高估了真实NT。

结论

与无脐带绕颈的同一胎儿相比,有脐带绕颈的胎儿测量值存在广泛离散。这妨碍了对真实NT的准确预测,尽管有脐带绕颈时重复测量的最大和最小值分别可以计算出最高和最低可能风险。在为患者提供咨询时必须考虑到这些事实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验