Hutchison Keith A
Department of Psychology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Jul;33(4):645-62. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.645.
In 2 experiments, participants completed both an attentional control battery (OSPAN, antisaccade, and Stroop tasks) and a modified semantic priming task. The priming task measured relatedness proportion (RP) effects within subjects, with the color of the prime indicating the probability that the to-be-named target would be related. In Experiment 2, participants were cued before each trial with the probability of a related target. Stimulus onset asynchronies traditionally thought to tap automatic processing (267 ms) versus controlled processing (1,240 ms) were used. Across experiments, principal component analysis on the battery revealed a general attentional control component. Moreover, the RP effect increased linearly with attentional control in both experiments. It is concluded that RP effects produced in this paradigm depend purely upon the effortful process of expectancy generation, which renders them sensitive to individual differences in attentional control.
在两项实验中,参与者既完成了注意力控制测试组(操作广度任务、反眼跳任务和斯特鲁普任务),也完成了一项经过修改的语义启动任务。启动任务测量了受试者内部的关联比例(RP)效应,启动刺激的颜色表明即将被命名的目标具有关联性的概率。在实验2中,每次试验前会向参与者提示相关目标的概率。使用了传统上认为可用于衡量自动加工(267毫秒)与控制加工(1240毫秒)的刺激呈现间隔。在两项实验中,对测试组进行主成分分析均揭示了一个一般注意力控制成分。此外,在两项实验中,RP效应均随注意力控制呈线性增加。得出的结论是,在此范式中产生的RP效应完全取决于期望生成的努力过程,这使得它们对注意力控制方面的个体差异敏感。