Saghir S A, Frantz S W, Spence M W, Nolan R J, Lowe E R, Rick D L, Bartels M J
Toxicology and Environmental Research and Consulting, The Dow Chemical Company, Bldg 1803, Midland, MI 48674, United States.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2007 Oct;45(10):2047-56. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 May 18.
This study was conducted to determine the relative dermal bioavailability (absorption), distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) of diisopropanolamine (DIPA), an alcohol amine used in a number of industrial and personal care products. Groups of 4 female Fischer 344 rats received either a single bolus i.v. dose of 19.0mg/kg (14)C-DIPA in water or a dermal application of 19.5mg/kg (14)C-DIPA in acetone to an area of 1cm(2) on the back and covered with a bandage. Time-course blood and excreta were collected and radioactivity determined. Urine was analyzed for DIPA and monoisopropanolamine (MIPA). Following i.v. administration, DIPA was rapidly cleared from the plasma and excreted into urine in a biexponential manner (t(1/2alpha), 0.4h; t(1/2beta), 2.9h). The levels of radioactivity in plasma dropped below the limit of detection 12h post-dosing. A total of 97+/-4% of the dose was actively excreted in urine by kidney, most ( approximately 71%) within 6h of dosing, virtually all as parent compound; renal clearance exceeded the glomerular filtration rate. Following dermal application, approximately 20% of the dose was absorbed in 48 h with the steady-state penetration rate of approximately 0.2%/h. Most (14.4%) of the applied radioactivity was excreted in urine at a relatively constant rate due to the presence of large amount of the (14)C-DIPA at the application site. Fecal elimination was <0.2% of the dose. The absorbed DIPA did not accumulate in tissues; only approximately 0.1% of the administered dose was found in liver and kidney. The absolute systemic dermal bioavailability (dose corrected AUC(dermal)/AUC(i.v.)) of (14)C-DIPA was 12%. The ADME of DIPA contrasts that of its diethanol analogue, diethanolamine, which displays a broad spectrum of toxicity in rats and mice. Toxicologically significant concentrations of DIPA are unlikely to be achieved in the systemic circulation and/or tissues as a result of repeated dermal application of products containing DIPA due to slow absorption from the skin, rapid unchanged elimination in urine, and majority of the products contain <or= 1% DIPA.
本研究旨在确定二异丙醇胺(DIPA)的相对皮肤生物利用度(吸收)、分布、代谢和排泄(ADME),DIPA是一种用于多种工业和个人护理产品的醇胺。将4组雌性Fischer 344大鼠,一组经静脉单次推注给予19.0mg/kg溶于水的(14)C-DIPA,另一组将19.5mg/kg溶于丙酮的(14)C-DIPA经皮涂抹于背部1cm²的区域,并用绷带覆盖。收集不同时间点的血液和排泄物并测定放射性。分析尿液中的DIPA和单异丙醇胺(MIPA)。静脉给药后,DIPA迅速从血浆中清除,并以双指数方式排泄到尿液中(t(1/2α),0.4小时;t(1/2β),2.9小时)。给药后12小时血浆中的放射性水平降至检测限以下。总共97±4%的剂量通过肾脏主动排泄到尿液中,大部分(约71%)在给药后6小时内排泄,几乎全部为母体化合物;肾清除率超过肾小球滤过率。经皮涂抹后,约20%的剂量在48小时内被吸收,稳态渗透速率约为0.2%/小时。由于涂抹部位存在大量的(14)C-DIPA,大部分(14.4%)涂抹的放射性以相对恒定的速率排泄到尿液中。粪便排泄量<剂量的0.2%。吸收的DIPA不会在组织中蓄积;在肝脏和肾脏中仅发现约0.1%的给药剂量。(14)C-DIPA的绝对全身皮肤生物利用度(剂量校正后的AUC(皮肤)/AUC(静脉))为12%。DIPA的ADME与其二乙醇类似物二乙醇胺不同,二乙醇胺在大鼠和小鼠中表现出广泛的毒性。由于皮肤吸收缓慢、尿液中快速原形排泄,且大多数产品中DIPA含量≤1%,因此反复经皮应用含DIPA的产品不太可能在体循环和/或组织中达到毒理学上显著的浓度。