Suppr超能文献

含异丙醇黑升麻提取物的药物产品对有更年期症状的中国女性的疗效和耐受性:一项与替勃龙对比的随机、双盲、平行对照研究

Efficacy and tolerability of a medicinal product containing an isopropanolic black cohosh extract in Chinese women with menopausal symptoms: a randomized, double blind, parallel-controlled study versus tibolone.

作者信息

Bai Wenpei, Henneicke-von Zepelin Hans-Heinrich, Wang Shuyu, Zheng Shurong, Liu Jianli, Zhang Zhonglan, Geng Li, Hu Lina, Jiao Chunfeng, Liske Eckehard

机构信息

The First Hospital of Peking University, Department of Gynecology, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Maturitas. 2007 Sep 20;58(1):31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2007.04.009. Epub 2007 Jun 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy-safety balance of the isopropanolic extract of Actaea (=Cimicifuga) racemosa (iCR, Remifemin) in comparison with tibolone in Chinese women with climacteric complaints.

METHOD

The randomized, double-blind, controlled 3-month study in 5 centers of 3 cities in China enrolled 244 menopausal patients aged 40-60 years and with a Kupperman Menopause Index (KMI)>or=15. The participants were assigned to either iCR corresponding to 40 mg crude drug/day (N=122) or tibolone 2.5mg/day (N=122) orally. The primary endpoint was the combination of the Mann-Whitney values (MWV) of the KMI and the frequency of adverse events (benefit-risk balance) at end of treatment (MWV>0.5 shows superiority; MWV>0.36 shows non-inferiority).

RESULTS

KMI decreased from 24.7+/-6.1 to 11.2+/-6.2 and 7.7+/-5.8 (iCR) and to 11.2+/-7.2 and 7.5+/-6.8 (tibolone) at 4 and 12 weeks. This remarkable and clinically relevant improvement was similar in both treatment groups (MWV=0.47; 95% CI=0.39-0.54; p(non-inferiority)=0.002) showing statistical significant non-inferiority of iCR to tibolone. The KMI-responder rate was similar in both groups (84% and 85%). The safety evaluation showed for both groups a good safety and tolerability profile, however, there is a significant lower incidence of adverse events (p<0.0001) in favor of the herbal treatment. None of the postmenopausal iCR patients experienced vaginal bleeding in contrast to tibolone (17 cases). Breast and abdominal pain as well as leukorrhea was mostly observed in the tibolone group (p=0.015, p=0.008, p=0.002). No serious adverse event was observed in the iCR-group, however, two occurred in the tibolone-group. The benefit-risk balance for iCR was significantly (p=0.01) superior to tibolone (MWV=0.56; 95% confidence interval [0.51-0.62]).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of iCR (medicinal product Remifemin) is as good as tibolone for the treatment of climacteric complaints, even for moderate to severe symptoms, whereby iCR is clearly superior regarding the safety profile. This iCR containing medicinal product is an excellent option for treatment of climacteric complaints which has now for the first time been verified in Asian women.

摘要

目的

比较黑升麻异丙醇提取物(iCR,莉芙敏)与替勃龙对有更年期症状的中国女性的疗效-安全性平衡。

方法

在中国3个城市的5个中心进行的为期3个月的随机、双盲、对照研究,纳入了244例年龄在40 - 60岁、库珀曼更年期指数(KMI)≥15的绝经患者。参与者被随机分为口服相当于40mg生药/天的iCR组(N = 122)或2.5mg/天的替勃龙组(N = 122)。主要终点是治疗结束时KMI的曼-惠特尼值(MWV)与不良事件发生频率的综合结果(效益-风险平衡)(MWV>0.5表示优效;MWV>0.36表示非劣效)。

结果

在第4周和第12周时,iCR组KMI从24.7±6.1降至11.2±6.2和7.7±5.8,替勃龙组降至11.2±7.2和7.5±6.8。两个治疗组的这种显著且具有临床意义的改善相似(MWV = 0.47;95%CI = 0.39 - 0.54;p(非劣效性)= 0.002),表明iCR在统计学上非劣于替勃龙。两组的KMI有效率相似(84%和85%)。安全性评估显示两组均具有良好的安全性和耐受性,但草药治疗组不良事件发生率显著更低(p<0.0001)。与替勃龙组(17例)不同,绝经后iCR组患者均未出现阴道出血。乳房和腹部疼痛以及白带增多大多出现在替勃龙组(p = 0.015,p = 0.008,p = 0.002)。iCR组未观察到严重不良事件,而替勃龙组出现了两例。iCR的效益-风险平衡显著优于替勃龙(p = 0.01)(MWV = 0.56;95%置信区间[0.51 - 0.62])。

结论

iCR(莉芙敏)治疗更年期症状的疗效与替勃龙相当,即使对于中度至重度症状也是如此,而且iCR在安全性方面明显更优。这种含iCR的药物是治疗更年期症状的极佳选择,首次在亚洲女性中得到验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验