Schmidt G W, Broman A T, Hindman H B, Grant Michael P
Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.
Ophthalmology. 2008 Jan;115(1):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.04.008. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
To assist ophthalmologists in treating ocular trauma patients, this study developed and validated a prognostic model to predict vision survival after open globe injury.
Retrospective cohort review.
Two hundred fourteen patients who sought treatment at the Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute with open globe injuries from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2004, were part of the data set used to build the classification tree model. Then, to validate the classification tree, 51 patients were followed up with the goal to compare their actual visual outcome with the outcome predicted by the tree grown from the classification and regression tree analysis.
Binary recursive partitioning was used to construct a classification tree to predict visual outcome after open globe injury. The retrospective cohort treated for open globe injury from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2004, was used to develop the prognostic tree and constitutes the training sample. A second independent sample of patient eyes seen from January 1, 2005, through October 15, 2005, was used to validate the prognostic tree.
Two main visual outcomes were assessed: vision survival (range, 20/20-light perception) and no vision (included no light perception, enucleation, and evisceration outcomes).
A prognostic model for open globe injury outcome was constructed using 214 open globe injuries. Of 14 predictors determined to be associated with a no vision outcome in univariate analysis, presence of a relative afferent pupillary defect and poor initial visual acuity were the most predictive of complete loss of vision; presence of lid laceration and posterior wound location also predicted poor visual outcomes. In an independent cohort of 51 eyes, the prognostic model had 85.7% sensitivity to predict no vision correctly and 91.9% specificity to predict vision survival correctly.
The open globe injury prognostic model constructed in this study demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy and should be useful in counseling patients and making clinical decisions regarding open globe injury management.
为协助眼科医生治疗眼外伤患者,本研究开发并验证了一种预测开放性眼球损伤后视力保留情况的预后模型。
回顾性队列研究。
2001年1月1日至2004年12月31日期间在威尔默眼科研究所因开放性眼球损伤寻求治疗的214例患者是用于构建分类树模型的数据集的一部分。然后,为了验证分类树,对51例患者进行了随访,目的是将他们的实际视力结果与通过分类与回归树分析生长的树所预测的结果进行比较。
采用二元递归划分构建分类树,以预测开放性眼球损伤后的视力结果。2001年1月1日至2004年12月31日接受开放性眼球损伤治疗的回顾性队列用于开发预后树,并构成训练样本。2005年1月1日至2005年10月15日期间就诊的患者眼的第二个独立样本用于验证预后树。
评估两个主要视力结果:视力保留(范围为20/20 - 光感)和无光感(包括无光感、眼球摘除和眼内容剜除结果)。
使用214例开放性眼球损伤构建了开放性眼球损伤结果的预后模型。在单变量分析中确定与无光感结果相关的14个预测因素中,相对性传入瞳孔障碍的存在和初始视力差对视力完全丧失的预测性最强;眼睑裂伤的存在和伤口位于后部也预示视力结果较差。在一个由51只眼组成的独立队列中,该预后模型正确预测无光感的敏感性为85.7%,正确预测视力保留的特异性为91.9%。
本研究构建的开放性眼球损伤预后模型显示出优异的预测准确性,在为患者提供咨询以及就开放性眼球损伤的处理做出临床决策方面应会有所帮助。