de Oliveira Lucia Brandão, da Cunha Ademir Batista, Martins Wolney de Andrade, de Abreu Rosiane Fátima Silveira, de Barros Luciana Silva Nogueira, Cunha Delma Maria, da Nóbrega Antonio Cláudio Lucas, Martins Filho Luiz Romeu
Centro Universitário Serra dos Orgãos, UNIFESO, Faculdade de Medicina de Teresópolis, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2007 May;88(5):565-72. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2007000500011.
Developing hypertension is likely to be at least two times greater in individual with exaggerated blood pressure response on exercise testing (ET). Few reports have evaluated the parameters of 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) in normotensive individuals with exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise.
To evaluate the relationship among the casual blood pressure with hyper-reactive response on ET and to compare Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) data of hyper-reactive individuals with a control group in order to detect early disorders, that allows a preventive action with prognostic implication.
Casual BP measurement and parameters of ABPM of 26 adult individuals, with mean age of 41.50+/-11.78 years, normotensive at rest and hyper-reactive on ET was compared to those of 16 adult individuals, with mean age of 41.38+/-11.55 years, normotensive at rest with normal BP response on exercise. The values <140 x 90 mmHg were considered normal for casual BP. The values <220 mmHg for systolic BP and/or an increase > or = 5 mmHg diastolic BP on ET for hyper-reactive response diagnosis.
Hyper-reactive individuals presented the systolic (p=0.03) and diastolic (p=0.002) casual BP and mean systolic BP (p=0.050), systolic pressure load during the day (p=0.011), and systolic (p=0.017) pressure load higher when compared to the control group.
Casual high normal BP had a positive correlation with exaggerated BP response. The hyper-reactive individuals showed particular characteristics in casual BP as well as in ABPM parameters, which, although within the range of reference values, differed from those of individuals with normal response to exercise.
运动试验(ET)时血压反应过度的个体发生高血压的可能性可能至少高出两倍。很少有报告评估血压反应过度的血压正常个体的24小时动态血压监测(ABPM)参数。
评估ET时血压反应过度的偶测血压之间的关系,并比较血压反应过度个体与对照组的动态血压监测(ABPM)数据,以检测早期疾病,从而采取具有预后意义的预防措施。
将26名平均年龄为41.50±11.78岁、静息血压正常且ET时血压反应过度的成年个体的偶测血压测量值和ABPM参数,与16名平均年龄为41.38±11.55岁、静息血压正常且运动时血压反应正常的成年个体进行比较。偶测血压值<140×90 mmHg被认为正常。收缩压<220 mmHg和/或ET时舒张压升高≥5 mmHg用于诊断血压反应过度。
与对照组相比,血压反应过度的个体偶测收缩压(p = 0.03)和舒张压(p = 0.002)以及平均收缩压(p = 0.050)、日间收缩压负荷(p = 0.011)和收缩压(p = 0.017)负荷更高。
偶测的高正常血压与血压反应过度呈正相关。血压反应过度的个体在偶测血压以及ABPM参数方面表现出特殊特征,尽管这些特征在参考值范围内,但与运动反应正常的个体不同。