Seipp Michael T, Durtschi Jacob D, Liew Michael A, Williams Jamie, Damjanovich Kristy, Pont-Kingdon Genevieve, Lyon Elaine, Voelkerding Karl V, Wittwer Carl T
ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental, Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
J Mol Diagn. 2007 Jul;9(3):284-9. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2007.060136.
Amplicon melting is a closed-tube method for genotyping that does not require probes, real-time analysis, or allele-specific polymerase chain reaction. However, correct differentiation of homozygous mutant and wild-type samples by melting temperature (Tm) requires high-resolution melting and closely controlled reaction conditions. When three different DNA extraction methods were used to isolate DNA from whole blood, amplicon Tm differences of 0.03 to 0.39 degrees C attributable to the extractions were observed. To correct for solution chemistry differences between samples, complementary unlabeled oligonucleotides were included as internal temperature controls to shift and scale the temperature axis of derivative melting plots. This adjustment was applied to a duplex amplicon melting assay for the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase variants 1298A>C and 677C>T. High- and low-temperature controls bracketing the amplicon melting region decreased the Tm SD within homozygous genotypes by 47 to 82%. The amplicon melting assay was 100% concordant to an adjacent hybridization probe (HybProbe) melting assay when temperature controls were included, whereas a 3% error rate was observed without temperature correction. In conclusion, internal temperature controls increase the accuracy of genotyping by high-resolution amplicon melting and should also improve results on lower resolution instruments.
扩增子熔解是一种用于基因分型的闭管方法,不需要探针、实时分析或等位基因特异性聚合酶链反应。然而,通过熔解温度(Tm)正确区分纯合突变体和野生型样本需要高分辨率熔解和严格控制的反应条件。当使用三种不同的DNA提取方法从全血中分离DNA时,观察到由于提取导致的扩增子Tm差异为0.03至0.39摄氏度。为了校正样本之间的溶液化学差异,将互补的未标记寡核苷酸作为内部温度对照,以移动和缩放导数熔解图的温度轴。这种调整应用于亚甲基四氢叶酸还原酶变体1298A>C和677C>T的双链扩增子熔解分析。在扩增子熔解区域两侧设置的高温和低温对照使纯合基因型内的Tm标准差降低了47%至82%。当包含温度对照时,扩增子熔解分析与相邻杂交探针(HybProbe)熔解分析的一致性为100%,而在没有温度校正的情况下观察到3%的错误率。总之,内部温度对照提高了通过高分辨率扩增子熔解进行基因分型的准确性,并且也应该改善在较低分辨率仪器上的结果。