Suppr超能文献

卡托普利试验与生理盐水输注试验用于排除醛固酮瘤的比较。

Comparison of the captopril and the saline infusion test for excluding aldosterone-producing adenoma.

作者信息

Rossi Gian Paolo, Belfiore Anna, Bernini Giampaolo, Desideri Giovambattista, Fabris Bruno, Ferri Claudio, Giacchetti Gilberta, Letizia Claudio, Maccario Mauro, Mallamaci Francesca, Mannelli Massimo, Palumbo Gaetana, Rizzoni Damiano, Rossi Ermanno, Agabiti-Rosei Enrico, Pessina Achille C, Mantero Franco

机构信息

DMCS Internal Medicine 4, Padova, Italy.

出版信息

Hypertension. 2007 Aug;50(2):424-31. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.091827. Epub 2007 Jun 25.

Abstract

We performed a prospective head-to-head comparison of the accuracy of the captopril test (CAPT) and the saline infusion test (SAL) for confirming primary aldosteronism due to an aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) in patients with different sodium intake. A total of 317 (26.9%) of the 1125 patients screened in the Primary Aldosteronism Prevalence in Italy Study underwent both CAPT and SAL. They were composed of the patients with a high aldosterone/renin ratio baseline and 1 every 4 patients without such criterion. The accuracy of post-CAPT or post-SAL plasma aldosterone values for diagnosing APA was estimated with the area under the receiver operator characteristics curves. Primary aldosteronism was found in 120 patients, of which 46 had an APA. No untoward effect occurred with either test. The area under the receiver operator characteristics curve of plasma aldosterone for both tests was higher (P<0.0001) than that under the diagonal, but the between-test difference was borderline significant (P=0.054). The optimal aldosterone cutoff value for identifying APA was 13.9 and 6.75 ng/dL for the CAPT and SAL, respectively. Even at these cutoffs, sensitivity and specificity were moderate because of overlap of values between patients with and without APA. When examined in relation to sodium intake, the accuracy of the SAL surpassed that of the CAPT in the patients with a sodium intake <or=130 mEq per day; this difference waned at a higher Na(+) intake. Thus, both the CAPT and the SAL are safe and moderately accurate for excluding APA; at a sodium intake >7.6 g per day, the SAL offers no advantage over the easier-to-perform CAPT.

摘要

我们对卡托普利试验(CAPT)和生理盐水输注试验(SAL)在不同钠摄入量患者中确诊醛固酮瘤(APA)所致原发性醛固酮增多症的准确性进行了前瞻性的直接比较。在意大利原发性醛固酮增多症患病率研究中筛查的1125例患者中,共有317例(26.9%)接受了CAPT和SAL两项试验。他们包括醛固酮/肾素比值基线较高的患者以及每4例中1例无此标准的患者。通过受试者操作特征曲线下面积评估CAPT或SAL后血浆醛固酮值诊断APA的准确性。120例患者被发现患有原发性醛固酮增多症,其中46例有APA。两项试验均未出现不良影响。两项试验的血浆醛固酮受试者操作特征曲线下面积均高于对角线下方(P<0.0001),但试验间差异接近显著(P=0.054)。识别APA的最佳醛固酮临界值,CAPT为13.9 ng/dL,SAL为6.75 ng/dL。即使在这些临界值下,由于有和无APA患者的值存在重叠,敏感性和特异性也处于中等水平。当根据钠摄入量进行检查时,钠摄入量≤130 mEq/天的患者中,SAL的准确性超过CAPT;在较高的钠摄入量时,这种差异减弱。因此,CAPT和SAL在排除APA方面都是安全且准确性中等;在钠摄入量>7.6 g/天时,SAL相对于操作更简便的CAPT并无优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验