• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长春瑞滨/卡铂与吉西他滨/卡铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效相似,但毒性影响不同。

Vinorelbine/carboplatin vs gemcitabine/carboplatin in advanced NSCLC shows similar efficacy, but different impact of toxicity.

作者信息

Helbekkmo N, Sundstrøm S H, Aasebø U, Brunsvig P Fr, von Plessen C, Hjelde H H, Garpestad O K, Bailey A, Bremnes R M

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø and Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Northern Norway, 9038 Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2007 Aug 6;97(3):283-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603869. Epub 2007 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603869
PMID:17595658
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2360329/
Abstract

This randomised phase III study in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was conducted to compare vinorelbine/carboplatin (VC) and gemcitabine/carboplatin (GC) regarding efficacy, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and toxicity. Chemonaive patients with NSCLC stage IIIB/IV and WHO performance status 0-2 were eligible. No upper age limit was defined. Patients received vinorelbine 25 mg m(-2) or gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 8 and carboplatin AUC4 on day 1 and three courses with 3-week cycles. HRQOL questionnaires were completed at baseline, before chemotherapy and every 8 weeks until 49 weeks. During 14 months, 432 patients were included (VC, n=218; GC, n=214). Median survival was 7.3 vs 6.4 months, 1-year survival 28 vs 30% and 2-year survival 7 vs 7% in the VC and GC arm, respectively (P=0.89). HRQOL, represented by global QOL, nausea/vomiting, dyspnoea and pain, showed no significant differences. More grade 3-4 anaemia (P<0.01), thrombocytopenia (P<0.01) and transfusions of blood (P<0.01) or platelets (P<0.01) were observed in the GC arm. There was more grade 3-4 leucopoenia (P<0.01) in the VC arm, but the rate of neutropenic infections was the same (P=0.87). In conclusion, overall survival and HRQOL are similar, while grade 3-4 toxicity requiring interventions are less frequent when VC is compared to GC in advanced NSCLC.

摘要

这项针对晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的随机III期研究旨在比较长春瑞滨/卡铂(VC)和吉西他滨/卡铂(GC)在疗效、健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)及毒性方面的差异。符合条件的为未经化疗的IIIB/IV期NSCLC患者,且世界卫生组织体能状态为0 - 2级,未设定年龄上限。患者在第1天和第8天接受长春瑞滨25 mg m(-2)或吉西他滨1000 mg m(-2),并在第1天接受卡铂AUC4,每3周为一个疗程,共三个疗程。HRQOL问卷在基线、化疗前以及化疗后每8周直至49周时完成。在14个月期间,共纳入432例患者(VC组,n = 218;GC组,n = 214)。VC组和GC组的中位生存期分别为7.3个月和6.4个月,1年生存率分别为28%和30%,2年生存率分别为7%和7%(P = 0.89)。以总体生活质量、恶心/呕吐、呼吸困难和疼痛所代表的HRQOL无显著差异。GC组观察到更多的3 - 4级贫血(P < 0.01)、血小板减少症(P < 0.01)以及输血(P < 0.01)或输血小板(P < 0.01)情况。VC组有更多的3 - 4级白细胞减少症(P < 0.01),但中性粒细胞感染率相同(P = 0.87)。总之,在晚期NSCLC中,与GC相比,VC的总生存期和HRQOL相似,但需要干预的3 - 4级毒性反应发生率更低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2b3/2360329/9f952696acab/6603869f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2b3/2360329/c0c0d6bae37d/6603869f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2b3/2360329/ef03866a9ce5/6603869f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2b3/2360329/9f952696acab/6603869f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2b3/2360329/c0c0d6bae37d/6603869f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2b3/2360329/ef03866a9ce5/6603869f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2b3/2360329/9f952696acab/6603869f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Vinorelbine/carboplatin vs gemcitabine/carboplatin in advanced NSCLC shows similar efficacy, but different impact of toxicity.长春瑞滨/卡铂与吉西他滨/卡铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效相似,但毒性影响不同。
Br J Cancer. 2007 Aug 6;97(3):283-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603869. Epub 2007 Jun 26.
2
Vinorelbine and gemcitabine vs vinorelbine and carboplatin as first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. A phase III randomised controlled trial by the Norwegian Lung Cancer Study Group.长春瑞滨联合吉西他滨与长春瑞滨联合卡铂一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的随机对照 III 期临床试验。挪威肺癌研究组。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Jul 24;107(3):442-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.284. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
3
Randomized phase II study of carboplatin/gemcitabine versus vinorelbine/gemcitabine in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group (WJTOG) 0104.卡铂/吉西他滨对比长春瑞滨/吉西他滨治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的随机II期研究:日本西部胸部肿瘤学组(WJTOG)0104
Cancer. 2006 Aug 1;107(3):599-605. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22024.
4
Phase III randomized trial comparing three platinum-based doublets in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.比较三种铂类双联化疗方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的III期随机试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Nov 1;20(21):4285-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.02.068.
5
Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus vinorelbine and cisplatin versus ifosfamide+gemcitabine followed by vinorelbine and cisplatin versus vinorelbine and cisplatin followed by ifosfamide and gemcitabine in stage IIIB-IV non small cell lung carcinoma: a prospective randomized phase III trial of the Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale.吉西他滨与顺铂对比长春瑞滨与顺铂对比异环磷酰胺 + 吉西他滨序贯长春瑞滨与顺铂对比长春瑞滨与顺铂序贯异环磷酰胺与吉西他滨治疗 IIIB-IV 期非小细胞肺癌:意大利南部肿瘤协作组的一项前瞻性随机 III 期试验
Lung Cancer. 2003 Feb;39(2):179-89. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5002(02)00444-0.
6
Randomized study of vinorelbine--gemcitabine versus vinorelbine--carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.长春瑞滨-吉西他滨与长春瑞滨-卡铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的随机研究。
Lung Cancer. 2005 Aug;49(2):233-40. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.03.029.
7
A randomized study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin and vinorelbine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.吉西他滨联合顺铂与长春瑞滨联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的随机研究。
Chang Gung Med J. 2008 Nov-Dec;31(6):559-66.
8
Randomized phase II study of carboplatin-paclitaxel or gemcitabine-vinorelbine in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group 0004.卡铂-紫杉醇或吉西他滨-长春瑞滨治疗体力状况为 2 分的晚期非小细胞肺癌的随机 II 期研究:日本西部胸部肿瘤学组 0004 研究。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb;35(1):58-63. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318201a0f3.
9
Phase III study by the Norwegian lung cancer study group: pemetrexed plus carboplatin compared with gemcitabine plus carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.挪威肺癌研究小组的III期研究:培美曲塞联合卡铂与吉西他滨联合卡铂作为晚期非小细胞肺癌一线化疗的比较
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jul 1;27(19):3217-24. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.9114. Epub 2009 May 11.
10
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin/gemcitabine versus gemcitabine/vinorelbine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II/III study of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network.紫杉醇/卡铂/吉西他滨与吉西他滨/长春瑞滨治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的比较:米妮·珀尔癌症研究网络的一项II/III期研究
Clin Lung Cancer. 2007 Sep;8(8):483-7. doi: 10.3816/CLC.2007.n.032.

引用本文的文献

1
Real world results of locally advanced and metastatic lung cancer patients treated with platinum doublet chemotherapy in first line: Moroccan cohort.一线接受铂类双联化疗的局部晚期和转移性肺癌患者的真实世界结果:摩洛哥队列研究。
Transl Oncol. 2024 Sep;47:102015. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102015. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
2
Best first-line therapy for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status.对于晚期非小细胞肺癌、体能状态 2 且无靶向突变或未知突变状态的患者,最佳一线治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 7;7(7):CD013382. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013382.pub2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Palliative chemotherapy beyond three courses conveys no survival or consistent quality-of-life benefits in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.对于晚期非小细胞肺癌,超过三个疗程的姑息性化疗并不能带来生存获益或持续的生活质量改善。
Br J Cancer. 2006 Oct 23;95(8):966-73. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603383. Epub 2006 Oct 3.
2
Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus observation in patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association [ANITA]): a randomised controlled trial.完全切除的ⅠB-ⅢA期非小细胞肺癌患者辅助使用长春瑞滨加顺铂与观察对比(辅助长春瑞滨国际试验协作组[ANITA]):一项随机对照试验
Lancet Oncol. 2006 Sep;7(9):719-27. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70804-X.
3
Improving the performance status in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with chemotherapy (ImPACt trial): a phase 2 study.
化疗改善晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的体能状态(ImPACt 试验):一项 2 期研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Aug;149(9):6399-6409. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04617-1. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
4
Cost-benefit analysis of ALK diagnosis vs. non-diagnosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Spain.西班牙晚期非小细胞肺癌患者间ALK诊断与未诊断的成本效益分析
Glob Reg Health Technol Assess. 2022 Sep 12;9:82-90. doi: 10.33393/grhta.2022.2449. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
5
Small-molecule inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and more: FDA-approved novel therapeutic drugs for solid tumors from 1991 to 2021.小分子抑制剂、免疫检查点抑制剂等:1991 年至 2021 年美国食品和药物管理局批准用于实体瘤的新型治疗药物。
J Hematol Oncol. 2022 Oct 8;15(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01362-9.
6
Clinical benefit of COX-2 inhibitors in the adjuvant chemotherapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.COX-2抑制剂在晚期非小细胞肺癌辅助化疗中的临床获益:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
World J Clin Cases. 2021 Jan 26;9(3):581-601. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i3.581.
7
Vinorelbine in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Real-World Data From a Single-Institution Experience.长春瑞滨治疗非小细胞肺癌:单中心真实世界经验。
Oncol Res. 2020 May 29;28(3):237-248. doi: 10.3727/096504019X15755437099308. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
8
Health-Related Quality of Life in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Methodological Appraisal Based on a Systematic Literature Review.晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的健康相关生活质量:基于系统文献综述的方法学评估
Front Oncol. 2019 Aug 12;9:715. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00715. eCollection 2019.
9
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of mortality in lung cancer: A meta-analysis of 5 prospective cohorts studies.非甾体抗炎药与肺癌死亡率风险:5项前瞻性队列研究的荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Aug;98(32):e16806. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016806.
10
Systematic evaluation of the efficacy-effectiveness gap of systemic treatments in metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer.系统评价转移性非小细胞肺癌系统治疗的疗效-效果差距。
Eur Respir J. 2018 Dec 20;52(6). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01100-2018. Print 2018 Dec.
Cancer statistics, 2006.2006年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2006 Mar-Apr;56(2):106-30. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.56.2.106.
4
Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus carboplatin versus single-agent gemcitabine in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: the Swedish Lung Cancer Study Group.吉西他滨联合卡铂对比单药吉西他滨治疗局部晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌的Ⅲ期试验:瑞典肺癌研究组
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 20;23(33):8380-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.2781.
5
Randomized study of vinorelbine--gemcitabine versus vinorelbine--carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.长春瑞滨-吉西他滨与长春瑞滨-卡铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的随机研究。
Lung Cancer. 2005 Aug;49(2):233-40. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.03.029.
6
Vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus docetaxel plus gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized trial.长春瑞滨联合顺铂与多西他赛联合吉西他滨治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌:一项III期随机试验
J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 1;23(13):2937-45. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.016. Epub 2005 Feb 22.
7
Gemcitabine plus carboplatin versus mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized study of the London Lung Cancer Group.吉西他滨联合卡铂与丝裂霉素、异环磷酰胺和顺铂治疗ⅢB期或Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效比较:伦敦肺癌研究组的一项Ⅲ期随机研究
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jan 1;23(1):142-53. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.037.
8
Multicentre randomised phase III study comparing the same dose and schedule of cisplatin plus the same schedule of vinorelbine or gemcitabine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.多中心随机III期研究,比较顺铂相同剂量和给药方案加长春瑞滨或吉西他滨相同给药方案用于晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效。
Eur J Cancer. 2005 Jan;41(1):81-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.08.029.
9
Efficacy of gemcitabine plus platinum chemotherapy compared with other platinum containing regimens in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of survival outcomes.吉西他滨联合铂类化疗与其他含铂方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效比较:生存结局的荟萃分析
Lung Cancer. 2005 Jan;47(1):69-80. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.10.014.
10
Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing Cisplatin to Carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.比较顺铂与卡铂用于晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Oct 1;22(19):3852-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.02.109. Epub 2004 Aug 23.