Suppr超能文献

曲安奈德联合与不联合玻璃体切割术治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞相关黄斑水肿的疗效比较研究

Comparative study on efficacy of a combination therapy of triamcinolone acetonide administration with and without vitrectomy for macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion.

作者信息

Hirano Yoshio, Sakurai Eiji, Yoshida Munenori, Ogura Yuichiro

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Res. 2007;39(4):207-12. doi: 10.1159/000104682. Epub 2007 Jun 26.

Abstract

AIMS

To compare the efficacy ofa combination therapy of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) administration with and without vitrectomy in eyes with macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion over a 1-year period.

METHODS

A retrospective, case-control study was conducted in 15 eyes of 15 patients with macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion. Eight eyes underwent simultaneous intravitreal and posterior sub-Tenon capsule injections of TA (TA-injected group). Seven eyes underwent vitrectomy with intravitreal or simultaneous posterior sub-Tenon capsule injection of TA (vitrectomy with TA group). Macular thickness and visual acuity were measured before and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the therapy.

RESULTS

Twelve months after the therapy, mean visual acuity improved significantly from baseline in both the TA-injected (p = 0.0069) and vitrectomy with TA groups (p = 0.0145). Macular thickness also improved significantly in both the TA-injected (p = 0.0065) and vitrectomy with TA groups (p = 0.0058). At 12 months after the therapy, there was no significant difference in visual acuity and macular thickness between the two groups (p = 0.3308 and 0.3711, respectively). At the early postoperative stage (1 and 3 months after the therapy), the central macular thickness in the TA-injected group was significantly less than that in the vitrectomy with TA group (p = 0.0140 and 0.0275, respectively); there was no significant difference in visual acuity between the two groups (p = 0.0796 and 0.3753, respectively).

CONCLUSION

TA injection without vitrectomy was as effective as a combination therapy of TA injection with vitrectomy.

摘要

目的

比较曲安奈德(TA)联合玻璃体切割术与不联合玻璃体切割术治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞相关黄斑水肿1年的疗效。

方法

对15例视网膜分支静脉阻塞相关黄斑水肿患者的15只眼进行回顾性病例对照研究。8只眼同时接受玻璃体腔及Tenon囊下注射TA(TA注射组)。7只眼接受玻璃体切割术联合玻璃体腔或同时Tenon囊下注射TA(TA玻璃体切割术组)。在治疗前及治疗后1、3、6和12个月测量黄斑厚度和视力。

结果

治疗12个月后,TA注射组(p = 0.0069)和TA玻璃体切割术组(p = 0.0145)的平均视力均较基线显著提高。TA注射组(p = 0.0065)和TA玻璃体切割术组(p = 0.0058)的黄斑厚度也显著改善。治疗12个月后,两组间视力和黄斑厚度无显著差异(分别为p = 0.3308和0.3711)。在术后早期(治疗后1和3个月),TA注射组的中心黄斑厚度显著低于TA玻璃体切割术组(分别为p = 0.0140和0.0275);两组间视力无显著差异(分别为p = 0.0796和0.3753)。

结论

不进行玻璃体切割术的TA注射与TA注射联合玻璃体切割术的联合治疗效果相同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验