大学生运动员对同性和异性运动训练师提供的伤病护理的自我报告舒适度。

Self-reported comfort of collegiate athletes with injury and condition care by same-sex and opposite-sex athletic trainers.

作者信息

Drummond Jan L, Hostetter Karen, Laguna Patricia L, Gillentine Andy, Del Rossi Gianluca

机构信息

The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104-3189, USA.

出版信息

J Athl Train. 2007 Jan-Mar;42(1):106-12.

DOI:
Abstract

CONTEXT

Athletes may experience similar comfort concerns as patients in other allied health care fields.

OBJECTIVE

To address athlete comfort with injury and condition care provided by same-sex and opposite-sex athletic trainers.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey design.

SETTING

Three National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I university athletic programs were invited and agreed to participate. Universities were selected by geographic location and affiliation with 3 National Athletic Trainers' Association districts.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

A total of 685 athletes (341 women, 344 men) completed questionnaires (277 in the Mid-America District, 282 in the Far West District, and 126 in the Southeast District).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Questionnaires consisted of 17 injuries and conditions common to both female and male athletic trainer scenarios. Three sex-specific items were added to each scenario. Responses were scored on a 5-point scale anchored by 1 (very uncomfortable) and 5 (very comfortable). Participants were asked to indicate the reason for any degree of discomfort. Internal consistency, determined by Cronbach alpha, was .93 for the female athletic trainer scenario and .95 for the male athletic trainer scenario.

RESULTS

We found significant injury and condition category-by-sex interactions for general medical conditions (F(1,683) = 578.9, P < .001), psychological conditions (F(1,683) = 136.2, P < .001), injuries to the upper body (F(1,683) = 175.7, P < .001), injuries to the mid-body (F(1,683) = 199.1, P < .001), and injuries to the lower body (F(1,683) = 4.9, P < .001). For gender-specific injuries and conditions, we found a difference between the mean ratings in both female athlete comfort (t(340) = -26.350, P < .001) and male athlete comfort (t(340) = -26.350, P < .001) when athletes were provided care by a female athletic trainer and a male athletic trainer. Overall, athletes appeared to be more comfortable when provided care by a same-sex athletic trainer. The most common reason reported for discomfort was gender related.

CONCLUSIONS

Both athletes and athletic trainers should be aware that athletes do experience discomfort, especially if the injury or condition is intimate in nature. It may be necessary to have athletic trainers of both sexes accessible to athletes to optimize the treatment received.

摘要

背景

运动员可能会遇到与其他联合医疗保健领域的患者类似的舒适度问题。

目的

探讨同性和异性运动训练师提供的伤病护理对运动员舒适度的影响。

设计

横断面调查设计。

地点

邀请了三个美国大学体育协会第一分区的大学体育项目并同意参与。这些大学是根据地理位置和与3个国家运动训练师协会地区的隶属关系选定的。

患者或其他参与者

共有685名运动员(341名女性,344名男性)完成了问卷调查(中美洲地区277份,远西地区282份,东南地区126份)。

主要观察指标

问卷包括17种男女运动训练师场景中常见的伤病情况。每个场景增加了3个针对性别的项目。回答采用5分制评分,1分表示“非常不舒服”,5分表示“非常舒服”。参与者被要求指出任何程度不适的原因。由克朗巴哈系数确定的内部一致性,女性运动训练师场景为0.93,男性运动训练师场景为0.95。

结果

我们发现,在一般医疗状况(F(1,683)=578.9,P<.001)、心理状况(F(1,683)=136.2,P<.001)、上身损伤(F(1,683)=175.7,P<.001)、身体中部损伤(F(1,683)=199.1,P<.001)和下身损伤(F(1,683)=4.9,P<.001)方面,存在显著的伤病类别与性别的交互作用。对于针对性别的伤病情况,我们发现当女性运动训练师和男性运动训练师为运动员提供护理时,女性运动员舒适度的平均评分(t(340)=-26.350,P<.001)和男性运动员舒适度的平均评分(t(340)=-26.350,P<.001)存在差异。总体而言,运动员在由同性运动训练师提供护理时似乎更舒适。报告的最常见不适原因与性别有关。

结论

运动员和运动训练师都应意识到运动员确实会感到不适,尤其是如果伤病性质较为私密。可能有必要为运动员提供男女运动训练师,以优化他们接受的治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索