Lagerros Ylva Trolle, Lagiou Pagona
Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, M9:01, 17176, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22(6):353-62. doi: 10.1007/s10654-007-9154-x. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
Physical inactivity has emerged as an important risk factor for a number of diseases, but the typically crude exposure assessments in epidemiological studies, with entailing variation in measurement accuracy, may be a source of heterogeneity contributing to inconsistent results among studies. Consequently, the choice of method for the assessment of physical activity in epidemiological studies is important. Good methods increase our chances of avoiding misclassification and may enhance our understanding of the association between physical activity and health. Since physical activity is also a potential confounder of other lifestyle-health relationships, good methods may enhance our ability to control for confounding. But despite a steadily increasing selection of methods to choose from, no method is suitable for every situation and every population. Although the questionnaire is the most widely used method in epidemiological studies, and laboratory methods are mainly used for validation purposes, improved technology may change our ways of assessing physical activity in the future. This paper describes different methods to measure physical activity and energy expenditure from the epidemiological perspective, and attempts to address the concepts related to the measurement of physical activity.
缺乏身体活动已成为多种疾病的重要风险因素,但流行病学研究中通常粗略的暴露评估,由于测量准确性存在差异,可能是导致研究结果不一致的异质性来源。因此,在流行病学研究中选择身体活动评估方法很重要。好的方法能增加我们避免错误分类的机会,并可能增进我们对身体活动与健康之间关联的理解。由于身体活动也是其他生活方式与健康关系的潜在混杂因素,好的方法可能增强我们控制混杂的能力。然而,尽管可供选择的方法不断增加,但没有一种方法适用于所有情况和所有人群。虽然问卷调查是流行病学研究中使用最广泛的方法,而实验室方法主要用于验证目的,但技术的进步可能会改变我们未来评估身体活动的方式。本文从流行病学角度描述了测量身体活动和能量消耗的不同方法,并试图阐述与身体活动测量相关的概念。