Bracco David, Hemmerling Thomas
Perioperative Cardiac Research Group (PeriCARG), Department of Anesthesiology, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Heart Surg Forum. 2007;10(4):E334-7. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20071077.
The use of epidural anesthesia carries risks that have been known for 50 years. The debate about the use of locoregional technique in cardiac anesthesia continues. The objective of this report is to estimate the risks and their variability of a catheter-related epidural hematoma in cardiac surgery patients and to compare it with other anesthetic and medical procedures.
Case series reporting the use of epidural anesthesia in cardiac surgery were researched through Medline. Additional references were retrieved from the bibliography of published articles and from the internet. Risks of complications in other anesthetic and medical activity were retrieved from recent reviews.
Based on the present evidence, the risk of epidural hematoma in cardiac surgery is 1:12,000 (95% CI of 1:2100 to 1:68,000), which is comparable to the risk in the nonobstetrical population of 1:10,000 (95% CI 1:6700 to 1:14,900). The risk of epidural hematoma is comparable to the risk of receiving a wrong blood product or the yearly risk of having a fatal road accident in Western countries.
The risk of a hematoma after epidural in cardiac surgery is comparable to other nonobstetrical surgical procedures. Its routine application in a controlled setting should be encouraged.
硬膜外麻醉的使用存在着已为人知50年的风险。关于局部区域技术在心脏麻醉中的应用的争论仍在继续。本报告的目的是评估心脏手术患者导管相关硬膜外血肿的风险及其变异性,并将其与其他麻醉和医疗程序进行比较。
通过Medline检索报道心脏手术中使用硬膜外麻醉的病例系列。从已发表文章的参考文献和互联网上检索其他参考文献。从近期综述中获取其他麻醉和医疗活动中并发症的风险。
根据现有证据,心脏手术中硬膜外血肿的风险为1:12,000(95%可信区间为1:2100至1:68,000),这与非产科人群中1:10,000(95%可信区间1:6700至1:14,900)的风险相当。硬膜外血肿的风险与接受错误血型血液制品的风险或西方国家每年发生致命道路交通事故的风险相当。
心脏手术硬膜外麻醉后血肿的风险与其他非产科手术程序相当。应鼓励在可控环境中常规应用。