Evans Rhodri, Edwards Adrian, Coulter Angela, Elwyn Glyn
Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2007;101(4):247-53. doi: 10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.02.027.
In the UK there has recently been considerable financial investment in the publicly funded health service, NHS, but it is unclear whether this has resulted in improvements in patient participation and shared decision-making. There has been encouragement from central government in the form of initiatives such as copying referral letters. Progress, however, has been slow, and the quality of materials, for example, available to patients is highly variable. Nonetheless, there are other organisations, outside of central government, which are active in this field. The Picker Institute, for example, is involved in research, policy and the development of initiatives to improve patient participation. Two of the most important arenas for shared decision-making implementation in the UK are education and the development of patient decision support technologies (PDSTs). In the case of medical education, whilst there has been some recognition at policy level, implementation, to date, has been limited across both undergraduate and postgraduate curricula. Similarly, the development of PDSTs has been unplanned and fragmented, though is gaining momentum in a number of clinical domains. In terms of barriers and support for shared decision-making implementation in the UK, attention has been focused on the role of financial incentives for healthcare organisations, and on the role of Information Technology, specifically the potential benefits to patients of the 3.3 euro National Programme for IT. The legislative framework in the UK is conducive to the implementation of shared decision-making, and there is a growing body of research literature, albeit focused on PDSTs.
在英国,最近对由公共资金资助的医疗服务体系——国民医疗服务体系(NHS)进行了大量财政投资,但尚不清楚这是否带来了患者参与度和共同决策方面的改善。中央政府通过诸如复印转诊信等举措给予了鼓励。然而,进展缓慢,例如,提供给患者的材料质量参差不齐。尽管如此,在中央政府之外,还有其他组织活跃在这一领域。例如,皮克研究所参与研究、政策制定以及改善患者参与度的举措开发。在英国,共同决策实施的两个最重要领域是教育和患者决策支持技术(PDSTs)的开发。在医学教育方面,虽然在政策层面有一定认识,但迄今为止,在本科和研究生课程中的实施都很有限。同样,PDSTs的开发一直是无计划且零散的,不过在一些临床领域正逐渐兴起。就英国共同决策实施的障碍和支持而言,注意力集中在医疗保健机构的经济激励作用以及信息技术的作用上,特别是33亿欧元的国家信息技术计划对患者的潜在益处。英国的立法框架有利于共同决策的实施,并且有越来越多的研究文献,尽管这些文献主要集中在PDSTs上。