Levin David C, Rao Vijay M, Parker Laurence, Frangos Andrea J, Sunshine Jonathan H
Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Penn, USA.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2007 Jul;4(7):457-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.02.011.
To determine whether the utilization rate of diagnostic catheter angiography (DCA) for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has been affected by the utilization in recent years of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and computed tomographic angiography (CTA).
Medicare Part B data sets for 2000 to 2004 were reviewed to study utilization trends in the Current Procedural Terminology, 4th ed., codes for DCA, MRA, and CTA of peripheral arteries. The Medicare physician specialty codes were used to indicate procedures performed by radiologists, cardiologists, surgeons, and other physicians. Utilization rates per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries were calculated.
Between 2000 and 2004, the total utilization rate of all 3 types of angiographic procedures for PAD rose from 789 to 969 per 100,000 (+23%). The rate for DCA dropped slightly, from 767 to 761 per 100,000, whereas the rate for MRA and CTA together increased from 23 to 208 per 100,000. Almost all MRA and CTA were performed by radiologists. Among radiologists, the DCA utilization rate dropped from 486 to 334 per 100,000 (-31%); among cardiologists and surgeons together, the DCA rate increased from 228 to 387 per 100,000 (+70%). The total utilization rate of all diagnostic angiographic procedures for PAD among radiologists increased by 3%, compared with much higher rate increases among cardiologist and surgeons.
Among radiologists, a substitution effect occurred, in that noninvasive procedures such as MRA and CTA progressively replaced an invasive procedure, DCA. However, the rapid increase in DCA utilization among cardiologists and surgeons led to an increase in the overall utilization rate of angiographic procedures for diagnosing PAD. Increasing self-referral for an invasive procedure such as DCA among these two specialties is of concern at a time when less expensive, noninvasive alternatives are readily available.
确定近年来磁共振血管造影(MRA)和计算机断层血管造影(CTA)的应用是否影响了外周动脉疾病(PAD)诊断性导管血管造影(DCA)的使用率。
回顾2000年至2004年医疗保险B部分数据集,以研究当前操作术语第4版中外周动脉DCA、MRA和CTA的编码使用趋势。医疗保险医生专业代码用于表明放射科医生、心脏病专家、外科医生和其他医生所进行的操作。计算每10万名医疗保险受益人的使用率。
2000年至2004年间,所有3种PAD血管造影检查的总使用率从每10万人789例上升至969例(增长23%)。DCA的使用率略有下降,从每10万人767例降至761例,而MRA和CTA的使用率合计从每10万人23例增至208例。几乎所有的MRA和CTA都是由放射科医生进行的。在放射科医生中,DCA的使用率从每10万人486例降至334例(下降31%);在心脏病专家和外科医生中,DCA的使用率从每10万人228例增至387例(增长70%)。放射科医生进行的所有PAD诊断性血管造影检查的总使用率增长了3%,而心脏病专家和外科医生的增长率则高得多。
在放射科医生中出现了替代效应,即MRA和CTA等非侵入性检查逐渐取代了侵入性检查DCA。然而,心脏病专家和外科医生中DCA使用率的快速上升导致了PAD诊断性血管造影检查总体使用率的增加。在有更便宜的非侵入性替代方法可供选择的情况下,这两个专业中DCA等侵入性检查的自我转诊增加令人担忧。