Hoshino Kouichi, Itoh Kunio, Masubuchi Akiko, Adachi Mayuko, Asakawa Tasuku, Watanabe Nobuaki, Kosaka Toshiyuki, Tanaka Yorihisa
Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Tohoku Pharmaceutical University, Komatsushima, Sendai, Japan.
Biol Pharm Bull. 2007 Jul;30(7):1191-8. doi: 10.1248/bpb.30.1191.
In this study, we investigated the properties of monkey liver aldehyde oxidase directed toward the clarification of species differences. The aldehyde oxidase preparation purified from male cynomolgus monkey liver cytosol showed a major 150 kDa Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB)-stained band together with a minor 130 kDa band using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Both bands were identified as being aldehyde oxidase by a database search of the MS data obtained with nano-liquid chromatography, quardrupole time of flight, mass spectrometry (nano-LC Q/TOF MS). Based on the sequence coverage, the 130 kDa protein was presumed to be deficient in 20-30 kDa mass from the N-terminus. Full male cynomolgus monkey aldehyde oxidase cDNA was cloned and sequenced with the four degenerate primers designed by considering the peptide sequences containing the amino acids specific for monkey aldehyde oxidase. The deduced amino acid sequences had 96% amino acid identity with those of human enzyme. The aldehyde oxidase expressed in Escherichia coli also exhibited two immunoreactive bands on SDS-PAGE/Western blot analysis. Further, the biphasic pattern was observed for Eadie-Hofstee plots of the (S)-enantiospecific 2-oxidation activity of RS-8359 with the expressed and cytosolic monkey liver aldehyde oxidase. The results suggested that two forms of aldehyde oxidase in monkey were the expression products by a single gene. In contrast, the similarly expressed rat aldehyde oxidase showed only one immunoreactive protein and monophasic pattern. The biphasic phenomenon could be caused by the existence of two aldehyde oxidase isoforms or two active sites in a single enzyme or some other reasons. Further studies on the problems of the biphasic pattern and species differences in aldehyde oxidase are needed.
在本研究中,我们对猴肝脏醛氧化酶的特性进行了研究,旨在阐明种属差异。从雄性食蟹猴肝脏胞质溶胶中纯化得到的醛氧化酶制剂,经十二烷基硫酸钠-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SDS-PAGE)分析,显示出一条主要的150 kDa考马斯亮蓝(CBB)染色带以及一条次要的130 kDa带。通过对纳升液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱(nano-LC Q/TOF MS)获得的MS数据进行数据库搜索,这两条带均被鉴定为醛氧化酶。根据序列覆盖率推测,130 kDa蛋白在N端缺失20 - 30 kDa的质量。通过考虑包含猴醛氧化酶特异性氨基酸的肽序列设计的4条简并引物,克隆并测序了完整的雄性食蟹猴醛氧化酶cDNA。推导的氨基酸序列与人类酶的氨基酸序列具有96%的同一性。在SDS-PAGE/蛋白质免疫印迹分析中,在大肠杆菌中表达的醛氧化酶也显示出两条免疫反应带。此外,用表达的和胞质的猴肝脏醛氧化酶对RS-8359的(S)-对映体特异性2-氧化活性进行伊迪-霍夫斯泰因(Eadie-Hofstee)作图时观察到双相模式。结果表明,猴体内的两种形式的醛氧化酶是由单个基因表达产生的。相比之下,类似表达的大鼠醛氧化酶仅显示一种免疫反应性蛋白和单相模式。双相现象可能是由两种醛氧化酶同工型的存在、单一酶中的两个活性位点或其他一些原因引起的。需要进一步研究醛氧化酶双相模式和种属差异的问题。