Suppr超能文献

使用多平面重建技术在计算机断层扫描上测量咽鼓管的角度和长度。

Measurement of angle and length of the eustachian tube on computed tomography using the multiplanar reconstruction technique.

作者信息

Takasaki Kenji, Takahashi Haruo, Miyamoto Ikue, Yoshida Haruo, Yamamoto-Fukuda Tomomi, Enatsu Kaori, Kumagami Hidetaka

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Sakamoto, Nagasaki, Japan.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2007 Jul;117(7):1251-4. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e318058a09f.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the anatomic features of the eustachian tube (ET) between children with and without otitis media with effusion (OME) and with adults.

METHODS

The angle and length of the ET in children with OME (54 ears, OME children) and without OME (50 ears, normal children), as well as those of normal adults (90 ears), were measured on computed tomography using the multiplanar reconstruction technique.

RESULTS

The angles of ET in the OME children group, the normal children group, and the normal adult group were 20.4 +/- 3.5 degrees and 21.2 +/- 4.8 degrees , 19.9 +/- 3.4 degrees and 20.0 +/- 3.6 degrees , and 27.3 +/- 2.7 degrees and 27.3 +/- 2.8 degrees on the right and the left sides, respectively. There was no significant difference between the right and the left side in any group (P = .541, P = .952, P = .978). The lengths of ET in the OME children group, the normal children group, and the normal adult group were 37.2 +/- 3.0 mm (mean +/- SD) and 37.6 +/- 3.2 mm, 37.5 +/- 3.3 mm and 38.0 +/- 3.2 mm, and 42.5 +/- 2.8 mm and 42.9 +/- 2.9 mm on the right and the left sides, respectively. There was no significant difference between the right and left sides in any group (P = .670, P = .597, and P = .545). Both the angles and lengths were significantly greater in the normal adult group than in either the OME children group or the normal children group (one-way analysis of variance and Fisher's protected least significant difference tests, P < .05), but there was no significant difference in either the angle or length of the ET between the OME and normal children groups (P > .05). In the OME and normal children groups, the angle was observed to constantly increase with age, and the values were found to be within the range of the adult size in all the patients older than 7.5 years and 7.7 years in the OME children group and the normal children group, respectively. As well as the angle, the lengths were observed to constantly increase with age, but the increase appeared to be greater at a younger age (until approximately 3 to 4 years) than at an older age, and the values were found to be within the range of the adult size in all the patients older than 6.8 years and 7.7 years in the OME children group and the normal children group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The angle and length of the ET are more horizontal and shorter in infants than in adults. However, there is no statistical difference between the angle and length of the ET in infants with and without OME. These results lead us to believe that a short and horizontal ET may not be a main etiologic factor related to high susceptibility to OME in infants and children.

摘要

目的

比较有和没有中耳积液(OME)的儿童与成人之间咽鼓管(ET)的解剖学特征。

方法

采用多平面重建技术,在计算机断层扫描上测量OME儿童(54耳,OME儿童组)、无OME儿童(50耳,正常儿童组)以及正常成人(90耳)的ET角度和长度。

结果

OME儿童组、正常儿童组和正常成人组右侧ET的角度分别为20.4±3.5度和21.2±4.8度、19.9±3.4度和20.0±3.6度、27.3±2.7度和27.3±2.8度,左侧分别为上述对应值。任何组内左右侧之间均无显著差异(P = 0.541,P = 0.952,P = 0.978)。OME儿童组、正常儿童组和正常成人组右侧ET的长度分别为37.2±3.0毫米(均值±标准差)和37.6±3.2毫米、37.5±3.3毫米和38.0±3.2毫米、42.5±2.8毫米和42.9±2.9毫米,左侧分别为上述对应值。任何组内左右侧之间均无显著差异(P = 0.670,P = 0.597,P = 0.545)。正常成人组的角度和长度均显著大于OME儿童组和正常儿童组(单因素方差分析和Fisher保护最小显著差异检验,P < 0.05),但OME儿童组和正常儿童组之间ET的角度或长度均无显著差异(P > 0.05)。在OME儿童组和正常儿童组中观察到角度随年龄不断增加,在OME儿童组中所有7.5岁以上患者以及正常儿童组中所有7.7岁以上患者中,角度值均在成人范围之内。除角度外,长度也随年龄不断增加,但在较年轻年龄段(直至约3至4岁)的增加似乎比在较年长年龄段更大,在OME儿童组中所有6.8岁以上患者以及正常儿童组中所有7.7岁以上患者中,长度值均在成人范围之内。

结论

婴儿ET的角度和长度比成人更水平且更短。然而,有和没有OME的婴儿之间ET的角度和长度无统计学差异。这些结果使我们相信,短而水平的ET可能不是婴儿和儿童对OME易感性高的主要病因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验